Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 535 U.S. 467 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case in which Verizon Communications argued that the FCC had an unreasonable way for setting rates for leasing network elements. It held that the FCC can require state commissions to set the rates charged by incumbents for leased elements on a forward-looking basis untied to the incumbents' investment and that the FCC can require incumbents to combine elements of their networks at the request of entrants.
535 U.S. 467Donald B. Verrilli Jr.Iowa Utilities BoardPublic service law in the United StatesSprint Communications, Inc. v. JacobsVerizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionVerizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2002)Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (2002)Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLPVerizon Communications Inc. v Federal Communications CommissionVerizon Communications v. FCC
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 535 U.S. 467 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case in which Verizon Communications argued that the FCC had an unreasonable way for setting rates for leasing network elements. It held that the FCC can require state commissions to set the rates charged by incumbents for leased elements on a forward-looking basis untied to the incumbents' investment and that the FCC can require incumbents to combine elements of their networks at the request of entrants.
has abstract
Verizon Communications Inc. v. ...... ks at the request of entrants.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
31,246,137
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,004,309,733
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC,
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Breyer
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
Verizon Communications Inc., e ...... . Iowa Utilities Board, et al.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Affirmed in part, reversed in ...... to the incumbents’ investment
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Scalia
@en
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg; Scalia, Thomas ; Thomas
@en
justia
Litigants
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
@en
majority
Souter
@en
NotParticipating
O'Connor
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Verizon Communications Inc. v. ...... ks at the request of entrants.
@en
label
Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Verizon Communications Inc., e ...... . Iowa Utilities Board, et al.
@en