Legal disputes over the Harry Potter series
Since first coming to wide notice in the late 1990s, the Harry Potter book series by J. K. Rowling has engendered a number of legal disputes. Rowling, her various publishers and Time Warner, the owner of the rights to the Harry Potter films, have taken numerous legal actions to protect their copyrights, and also have fielded accusations of copyright theft themselves. The worldwide popularity of the Harry Potter series has led to the appearance of a number of locally produced, unauthorised sequels and other derivative works, sparking efforts to ban or contain them. While these legal proceedings have countered a number of cases of outright piracy, other attempts have targeted not-for-profit endeavours and have been criticised.
Adrian Jacobs (author)G. Norman LippertGeorge Norman LippertHall of Elders' CrossingHarry Potter and Bao ZoulongHarry Potter and Leopard-Walk-Up-to-DragonHarry Potter and Leopard-Walk-Up-to-Dragon (illegal book)Harry Potter and the Crystal VaseHarry Potter and the Golden TurtleHarry Potter and the LawHarry Potter and the Porcelain DollHarry Potter lawsuitHarry Potter legal disputesJames Potter and the Hall of Elders' CrossingJames potter and the hall of elders' crossingLarry PotterLarry Potter and His Best Friend LillyLegal disputes over Harry PotterLegal disputes over harry potterLegend of Rah and the MugglesN.K. StoufferN. K. StoufferNK StoufferNancy K. StoufferNancy StoufferThe Legend of Rah and the MugglesUnauthorized Chinese Harry Potter BooksUnauthorized Chinese Harry Potter books
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Legal disputes over the Harry Potter series
Since first coming to wide notice in the late 1990s, the Harry Potter book series by J. K. Rowling has engendered a number of legal disputes. Rowling, her various publishers and Time Warner, the owner of the rights to the Harry Potter films, have taken numerous legal actions to protect their copyrights, and also have fielded accusations of copyright theft themselves. The worldwide popularity of the Harry Potter series has led to the appearance of a number of locally produced, unauthorised sequels and other derivative works, sparking efforts to ban or contain them. While these legal proceedings have countered a number of cases of outright piracy, other attempts have targeted not-for-profit endeavours and have been criticised.
has abstract
45xCe modèle est-il pertinent ...... tter, Les Reliques de la Mort.
@fr
Since first coming to wide not ...... demark and Copyright Law Blog.
@en
Una serie di azioni legali son ...... segretezza sui libri a venire.
@it
《哈利·波特与豹走龙》(Harry Potter and L ...... 业(《魔戒》三部曲电影版权持有者)没有通过任何法律途径索偿。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
11,927,826
Wikipage revision ID
741,137,001
type
comment
45xCe modèle est-il pertinent ...... au sujet du « droit de lire ».
@fr
Since first coming to wide not ...... ours and have been criticised.
@en
Una serie di azioni legali son ...... segretezza sui libri a venire.
@it
《哈利·波特与豹走龙》(Harry Potter and L ...... 孙女。该书自称“出版者”为内蒙古人民出版社,但旋即为其否认。
@zh
label
Dispute legali su Harry Potter
@it
Legal disputes over the Harry Potter series
@en
Litiges sur la série Harry Potter
@fr
哈利·波特与豹走龙
@zh