In re A.C.
In re A.C. was a 1987 District of Columbia Court of Appeals case. It was the first appellate court case decided against forced Caesarean sections, although the decision was issued after the fatal procedure was performed. Physicians performed a Caesarean section upon patient Angela Carder (née Stoner) without informed consent in an unsuccessful attempt to save the life of her fetus. The case stands as a landmark in United States case law establishing the rights of informed consent and bodily integrity for pregnant women.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
In re A.C.
In re A.C. was a 1987 District of Columbia Court of Appeals case. It was the first appellate court case decided against forced Caesarean sections, although the decision was issued after the fatal procedure was performed. Physicians performed a Caesarean section upon patient Angela Carder (née Stoner) without informed consent in an unsuccessful attempt to save the life of her fetus. The case stands as a landmark in United States case law establishing the rights of informed consent and bodily integrity for pregnant women.
has abstract
In re A.C. was a 1987 District ...... integrity for pregnant women.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
999,099,275
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
In re A.C. was a 1987 District ...... integrity for pregnant women.
@en
label
In re A.C.
@en