Strict liability (criminal)
In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind") does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus (Latin for "guilty act") although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense. The liability is said to be strict because defendants could be convicted even though they were genuinely ignorant of one or more factors that made their acts or omissions criminal. The defendants may therefore not be culpable in any real way, i.e. there is not even criminal negligence, the least blameworthy level of mens rea.
Wikipage redirect
Absolute liabilityAlcohol laws of New JerseyCommonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas StudentsConcealed carry in the United StatesConvention on CybercrimeCriminal law of CanadaCriminal law of the United StatesCriminal possession of a weaponCriminal remedies for copyright infringementDeirdre Murphy (judge)Forest LaboratoriesIllegal per seIntoxication defenseLawLionel BlackmanList of United Kingdom Supreme Court casesList of red-light districtsMens reaMistake (criminal law)Model Penal CodeNulla poena sine culpaQuasi-criminalR v LarsonneurR v Sault Ste-Marie (City of)Register of data controllersSection 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867Strict liability offenceSweet v ParsleyThirty-first Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
seeAlso
primaryTopic
Strict liability (criminal)
In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind") does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus (Latin for "guilty act") although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense. The liability is said to be strict because defendants could be convicted even though they were genuinely ignorant of one or more factors that made their acts or omissions criminal. The defendants may therefore not be culpable in any real way, i.e. there is not even criminal negligence, the least blameworthy level of mens rea.
has abstract
Als objektive Bedingung der St ...... nerbegünstigung § 283d IV StGB
@de
Em Direito, imputação objetiva ...... e diferentes no Direito Penal.
@pt
In criminal law, strict liabil ...... pable as the actual wrongdoer.
@en
Объективное вменение — это при ...... представляется целесообразным.
@ru
客観的処罰条件（きゃっかんてきしょばつじょうけん）とは、刑法 ...... に一定の条件を具備することが要求される場合のその条件をいう。
@ja
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,009,750,100
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
comment
Als objektive Bedingung der St ...... vant, der Irrtum unbeachtlich.
@de
Em Direito, imputação objetiva ...... denamento jurídico brasileiro.
@pt
In criminal law, strict liabil ...... blameworthy level of mens rea.
@en
Объективное вменение — это при ...... представляется целесообразным.
@ru
客観的処罰条件（きゃっかんてきしょばつじょうけん）とは、刑法 ...... に一定の条件を具備することが要求される場合のその条件をいう。
@ja
label
Imputação objetiva
@pt
Objektive Bedingung der Strafbarkeit
@de
Strict liability (criminal)
@en
Объективное вменение
@ru
客観的処罰条件
@ja