Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England.
about
Public participation in decision-making on the coverage of new antivirals for hepatitis C.Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care.Impact of a non-return-to-work prognostic model (WORRK) on allocation to rehabilitation clinical pathways: A single centre parallel group randomised trial
P2860
Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@ast
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@en
type
label
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@ast
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@en
prefLabel
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@ast
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Does accountability for reason ...... mmissioning groups in England.
@en
P2093
Katharina Kieslich
Peter Littlejohns
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-007908
P577
2015-07-10T00:00:00Z