Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
about
Health Technology Assessment of pathogen reduction technologies applied to plasma for clinical useFraming and the health policy process: a scoping reviewSetting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for EvaluationEngaging stakeholders and target groups in prioritising a public health intervention: the Creating Active School Environments (CASE) online Delphi studyA community-based participatory approach and engagement process creates culturally appropriate and community informed pandemic plans after the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: remote and isolated First Nations communities of sub-arctic Ontario, Canada.Civil society participation in the health system: the case of Brazil's Health CouncilsPriority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of the Canadian public's perspectivesSocial value judgments in healthcare: a philosophical critique.Target for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol)"Asthma can take over your life but having the right support makes that easier to deal with." Informing research priorities by exploring the barriers and facilitators to asthma control: a qualitative analysis of survey data.Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocolAssessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.Health systems and sustainability: doctors and consumers differ on threats and solutions.Extent and patterns of community collaboration in local health departments: An exploratory survey.Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practiceCommunity participation in rural health: a scoping review.Consumers' perspectives on national health insurance in South Africa: using a mobile health approach.Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.Decision maker perceptions of resource allocation processes in Canadian health care organizations: a national surveyDeliberation to enhance awareness of and prioritize socioeconomic interventions for health.Public engagement in health priority setting in low- and middle-income countries: current trends and considerations for policyTwo methods for engaging with the community in setting priorities for child health research: who engages?Personal needs versus national needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and national levelsPublic preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.Public attitudes and values in priority settingA framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics.Public's approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatismStakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagementDefining Priorities for Future Research: Results of the UK Kidney Transplant Priority Setting PartnershipPrioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy.Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review.Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.Integrating Public Health and Deliberative Public Bioethics: Lessons from the Human Genome Project Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications ProgramAn Evaluation of In-Person and Online Engagement in Central Newfoundland.Assessing Patient Participation in Health Policy Decision-Making in CyprusTo accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing.Citizens' participation in the Italian health-care system: the experience of the Mixed Advisory Committees.
P2860
Q26741073-2AA7861B-BE05-403C-B399-2D58C756153FQ26766208-6E70979B-91B4-43AA-8582-5DA21030705FQ28083424-F4AA2FC0-70AD-4AA3-B0D1-84C70BDCFBB9Q28559376-A2202DFF-F6B1-4BA8-A69E-EA0506356902Q30224676-38591EB9-A2DD-46DC-9808-FB403EAFA953Q30380780-488A727F-6673-4F21-A9A2-62068BB0C5D4Q30414658-A7BA77D2-2495-4CE7-89D9-B3EA17DA6E74Q30419925-FAAF7075-3B16-48D6-AD44-2BEDB0CCDA59Q30501317-19C75BFF-FE9C-4560-8AE6-F16968B6A329Q31148649-6D517A6F-FCB9-407F-98D8-D4F312FE924AQ33786044-46B7FB35-2F85-4F91-9DAA-1A80B541EE30Q33812977-C848D98B-F38D-412A-B520-EEEFD40B22C2Q33838431-5918C768-9487-4551-8EBD-90AF488AC4E8Q33872198-A994BAA1-D156-4AE4-9312-2A8D48B55005Q33893891-50504015-F2D0-40E5-9C5B-F662C92AEB77Q34043845-E1F211F4-6538-48C8-9CE1-5278714DBEF1Q34160494-D23EE5C8-59C9-439A-8FF7-F9C4DFED25B5Q34478219-CFD4117A-0626-43AF-BF87-358082BCE453Q34588727-8753E972-80AD-4D1E-B8CD-DD5990993449Q34657831-D3024947-E130-4851-8FB0-F8CCABC55314Q34778136-1C377424-D948-4AC3-9C39-FF41D82EA504Q34790212-CA5E1B6D-EE44-4C3D-B9DA-E2AE9B313264Q34848598-680440FB-7F99-4413-B648-E3AD619790B5Q34934241-6B18160F-8146-4631-A4E8-20BBFD92390CQ35566015-55D3E679-F296-4016-8C20-F9BD411267B7Q35610022-1A7E405F-3C3B-42E7-9E96-AE1018972A27Q35689085-7DD6392A-87C4-4E5E-AFC4-FED7FA83C631Q35761254-6CA5EFB3-A134-43F0-BB33-43E9E4B0177AQ35912049-EC61A555-163D-4B87-A99B-4DA3CB32DBD4Q35977251-775C83AD-040E-4C4F-93F7-C8D3F35D6D0EQ36021512-2EDF5CDD-EADD-4667-A9A7-F44CC58EE3D9Q36173068-4D3C0789-CC24-4CFC-9BF7-BD07D1D2F183Q36177870-9450DBB3-C119-4A70-8BE4-FE4B0C3D064BQ36342194-CA59A175-E5D0-4A49-914C-556B6D1B6192Q36426735-C7BA2255-0A6A-47BA-87DA-FD9D3AADE9C0Q36472757-B87ED908-7666-41F8-A34B-066B6B9B6D67Q36509249-AAEC39BD-0C30-45F1-968E-9B064951F178Q37141798-26DFFCAE-1743-4967-966D-FAD5C1E46E99Q37332988-D1424384-C97D-45D9-B3A6-257D5F834F5AQ37333157-3875ED90-3B1E-45D1-9007-6C3BB8615A33
P2860
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 03 March 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@en
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@nl
type
label
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@en
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@nl
prefLabel
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@en
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
@en
P2093
Brian Evoy
Craig Mitton
Julia Abelson
P304
P356
10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2009.01.005
P577
2009-03-03T00:00:00Z