Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
about
Progress testing with short answer questions.Measuring competence in central venous catheterization: a systematic-review.Validity and reliability of the Standardized Orthopedic Assessment Tool (SOAT): a variation of the traditional objective structured clinical examination.A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations.An exploratory study into the effect of time-restricted internet access on face-validity, construct validity and reliability of postgraduate knowledge progress testingInitial reliability of the Standardized Orthopedic Assessment Tool (SOAT)Expertise in performance assessment: assessors' perspectives.Creativity in clinical communication: from communication skills to skilled communication.Dental students' peer assessment: a prospective pilot study.A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment.Constructing a validity argument for the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): a systematic review of validity evidence.On the Assessment of Paramedic Competence: A Narrative Review with Practice Implications.In search of educational efficiency: 30 years of Medical Education's top-cited articles.Learner perception of oral and written examinations in an international medical training program.Can contextual online exams in practical biomedical education increase comprehension and motivation?: a pilot project.Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.Improving in-training evaluation programs.Use of an error-focused checklist to identify incompetence in lumbar puncture performances.A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.Checking the checklist: a content analysis of expert- and evidence-based case-specific checklist items.Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation.Making the professionalism curriculum for undergraduate medical education more relevant.CanMEDS and other "competency and outcome-based approaches" in medical education: clarifying the ongoing ambiguity.Toolbox of assessment tools of technical skills in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: A systematic review.A perspective on clinical evaluation in nursing education.Comparison of self, physician, and simulated patient ratings of pharmacist performance in a family practice simulator.Use of portfolios as a learning and assessment tool in a surgical practical session of urology during undergraduate medical training.The structured oral self-directed learning evaluation: one method of evaluating the clinical reasoning skills of occupational therapy and physiotherapy students.Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia.Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.Assessing competence to practise in nursing: a review of the literature
P2860
Q30352120-EFB8AC62-CD44-4BDC-928F-FAB030982971Q30570380-3345F76A-4EDE-471E-AE17-C02ABBE5F489Q33841303-3D65D422-D506-4FD8-9424-A518D98DD268Q34377998-7773174A-4B3B-46F9-BF43-5DF9EADFE12FQ34493355-DB4ACE75-2F7C-4E7F-A9E4-2389E51BD011Q36900660-DDEA0546-6600-43C6-8DD4-2FEA49A65CB1Q37157957-FD5089F4-842E-489B-B697-5D4CA7815A21Q37836985-80D1900E-B198-4302-AE75-8142D6004FA3Q38244311-3C27289F-244B-4410-A6F3-878A14F11B00Q38334496-FF6043E1-2BEA-4A8D-B250-AB9208720B28Q38363551-020B613D-006B-4C5F-92DD-5A3EE46817DCQ38653102-AC77FDDD-A530-47C9-89F3-3E21593BAD3AQ38726532-1677047B-2E8D-4FDA-84F6-3E9D8F76C8EBQ39880175-A1ECDC31-CBB0-412C-83F0-0A2B6139DD43Q40010927-DC75556A-5191-47ED-8173-0F93D8E9775FQ40086279-05951FBE-D569-49D2-BD75-873479A4579AQ41190046-307E0906-BFD8-4806-88D1-52F33883F34CQ43238939-427BC075-FF87-4C99-81F1-F5494967F50AQ43510568-593BA25B-3BD1-4A14-B5BD-A69116AE82EBQ45904756-984D0BF5-0718-4013-886B-361CB5BA48B5Q46141098-B058DA92-C243-4440-885A-9B79DF9851B4Q46298509-13E8BE92-6CA3-47BA-AD69-E15460EBD68FQ46930187-DF0B22A8-B7CF-411F-A76F-D040AD1F37F4Q48227679-0DB656EF-A86C-4E9F-B597-07BD780E065DQ48706635-7FBE1ADE-9D3B-479B-B801-DE9B6ED53FD5Q51991557-3AC3173D-44FE-4180-822D-D20E64FD7B83Q52013696-B8810870-A525-4844-AC11-881F5495CE95Q52228408-478CF8A8-8E5F-48FF-B312-76F18E3B144AQ53111071-4F04604D-F662-432B-B703-FB409A3EBD4BQ53647133-1AC590BD-512F-4938-9542-A1B9F4017DA6Q57560976-51FDAFED-5548-4FE8-8048-5DB39B5EA3A3
P2860
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on March 1991
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@en
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@nl
type
label
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@en
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@nl
prefLabel
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@en
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.
@en
P2093
De Graaff E
Van der Vleuten CP
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2923.1991.TB00037.X
P577
1991-03-01T00:00:00Z