about
Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgeryOptimising care for patients with cognitive impairment and dementia following hip fracture.Challenging social cognition models of adherence: cycles of discourse, historical bodies, and interactional order.Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of functional strength training for people between six months and five years after stroke: FeSTivaLS trialEvaluation of the effectiveness of manual chest physiotherapy techniques on quality of life at six months post exacerbation of COPD (MATREX): a randomised controlled equivalence trial.Assessment of people with cognitive impairment and hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Promoting physical activity interventions in communities with poor health and socio-economic profiles: A process evaluation of the implementation of a new walking group scheme.Systematic review investigating the reporting of comorbidities and medication in randomized controlled trials of people with dementia.Does anticholinergics drug burden relate to global neuro-disability outcome measures and length of hospital stay?Implementing enhanced recovery pathways: a literature review with realist synthesis.Feasibility study suggests no impact from protected engagement time on adverse events in mental health wards for older adults.Rehabilitation following first-time patellar dislocation: a randomised controlled trial of purported vastus medialis obliquus muscle versus general quadriceps strengthening exercises.Factors predicting incidence of post-operative delirium in older people following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental factors and hospitalisation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a rural county of England.PERFECTED enhanced recovery (PERFECT-ER) care versus standard acute care for patients admitted to acute settings with hip fracture identified as experiencing confusion: study protocol for a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial.Freedom of Information Act: scalpel or just a sharp knife?Systematic Review Investigating Multi-disciplinary Team Approaches to Screening and Early Diagnosis of Dementia in Primary Care - What are the Positive and Negative Effects and Who Should Deliver It?Misunderstandings, communicative expectations and resources in illness narratives: insights from beyond interview transcripts.The FeSTivaLS trial protocol: a randomized evaluation of the efficacy of functional strength training on enhancing walking and upper limb function later post stroke.The development, validation and internal consistency of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score.Development of the Thai version of Mini-Cog, a brief cognitive screening test.The importance of detecting and managing comorbidities in people with dementia?The Norwich Patellar Instability Score: Validity, internal consistency and responsiveness for people conservatively-managed following first-time patellar dislocationChest physiotherapy during an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseResisting medications: moral discourses and performances in illness narrativesThe lived experience of head and neck cancer patients receiving curative radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-ethnographyA systematic review of the content and delivery of education in pulmonary rehabilitation programmesThe electronic frailty index as an indicator of community healthcare service utilisation in the older populationSocial Prescribing Programmes to Prevent or Delay Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older AdultsDevelopment of a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (COMBINE): study protocol
P50
Q24187184-5955B49A-7A26-4A15-B36B-82A2B25730DEQ30356843-2556E498-C968-4099-8864-D83F3E5198A5Q30366913-5A3B62A3-68DB-43BE-9CEF-64E595CCECCBQ34067555-C9769784-E275-4FE2-993D-9B4E7F6E87DBQ34322560-AC492942-DF25-4EC1-8099-E63CF75BCA2BQ34726555-14796D8D-5116-4362-89BF-CAD34CB00407Q37366523-59D86DA5-C9EF-4C5F-88F6-F95BDBC869A2Q38231228-21E88F30-A46E-48B8-B4AF-BC0DE4AE84A7Q38569407-5780A693-6125-422A-A5D0-6E8C681C7783Q38662459-760A6BA4-3CAB-459C-9011-FA2691ADA72BQ38691716-6A0D17F6-9236-44E4-A717-6A430ACE80D3Q39013267-9C944D1B-1FE5-4290-A2CB-B248868D2154Q39091498-6EEC51D4-7D20-4ECE-8B84-DE2ACA8284D4Q39873365-FCE0AA1B-02F1-4853-ACDF-E29DAC9CA31FQ47133728-C925FDBB-D974-4301-A9C9-81E321A70C2FQ47605311-6C954E7C-C5DB-4FD1-B58D-EA17D4AB7D94Q47701537-B169BF6D-99E9-4483-A69C-E338DFF3E1F8Q47800281-E2CCD8F6-CBBD-4B8D-A974-0A7186B8F87FQ47893181-8FDA3812-089D-435B-A39C-55E75D48F1FDQ48542288-45C94670-0A4C-4338-8CDA-8F9D566ECEF4Q50625913-6C87D073-D116-47E8-A064-42B2DF03EA60Q51812303-8BE8E802-3A15-443A-B0F3-8A16BEC1C367Q60817165-592AB820-16A2-4005-A42B-2916373E2963Q84266499-5431C23B-BC8C-4928-80F1-F6CF89BBF109Q84485002-1C4106B3-23A1-4A8E-80E2-4C7630DD4C66Q89044593-24840FF1-6DB4-492B-B0FC-F4A0A13D48CFQ90224367-E0293140-EFA7-4305-A2AE-54264A12E574Q90778955-7799A457-4340-479C-9CFB-6C297343A9A5Q91552036-3F812D62-2ED7-4635-B51E-2456DEF9991BQ92760205-E80719A3-FD66-47D3-A56B-E55E546B349A
P50
description
onderzoeker
@nl
researcher
@en
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Jane Cross
@ast
Jane Cross
@en
Jane Cross
@es
Jane Cross
@nl
type
label
Jane Cross
@ast
Jane Cross
@en
Jane Cross
@es
Jane Cross
@nl
prefLabel
Jane Cross
@ast
Jane Cross
@en
Jane Cross
@es
Jane Cross
@nl
P106
P1153
7402348790
P31
P496
0000-0002-7003-1916