Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
about
Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.: Let hydrologists learn the latest computer science by working with Research Software Engineers (RSEs) and not reinvent the waterUsing Modeling Tools to Better Understand Permafrost HydrologyReply to comment by Añel on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?”Reproducible, component-based modeling with TopoFlow, a spatial hydrologic modeling toolkit
P2860
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
description
im Oktober 2016 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в жовтні 2016
@uk
name
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@en
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@nl
type
label
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@en
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@nl
prefLabel
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@en
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?
@en
P2093
Chris Duffy
Christopher Hutton
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/2016WR019285
P577
2016-10-01T00:00:00Z