Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
about
Patterns and Determinants of Habitat Occupancy by the Asian Elephant in the Western Ghats of Karnataka, IndiaPredicting the geographic distribution of a species from presence-only data subject to detection errors.Nondetection sampling bias in marked presence-only dataAccounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review.Modeling the distribution of Geodia sponges and sponge grounds in the Northwest Atlantic.Silvicolous on a small scale: possibilities and limitations of habitat suitability models for small, elusive mammals in conservation management and landscape planningSpatial models to account for variation in observer effort in bird atlasesThe common cuckoo is an effective indicator of high bird species richness in Asia and Europe.Identifying common patterns in diverse systems: effects of exurban development on birds of the Adirondack Park and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA.A statistically rigorous sampling design to integrate avian monitoring and management within Bird Conservation Regions.Predicting species distributions from samples collected along roadsides.Large unburnt areas, not small unburnt patches, are needed to conserve avian diversity in fire-prone landscapesImperfect detection impacts the performance of species distribution modelsAnalysing and mapping species range dynamics using occupancy modelsFostering integration between biodiversity monitoring and modellingIntegrating detection probabilities in species distribution models of amphibians breeding in Mediterranean temporary pondsEvaluation of species distribution models by resampling of sites surveyed a century ago by Joseph GrinnellPerformance tradeoffs in target-group bias correction for species distribution models
P2860
Q28646529-2857BA33-D048-4E6F-A0D7-4C152F82C3F6Q30560284-AEEAC4F3-A797-47F3-892D-310FC873653CQ30740662-D1559ED7-5921-4116-B5A7-B630DEC9B490Q34428410-62F1F8B6-DDEE-4180-8409-F8959A384189Q35064136-7B612A69-A9D8-4EDE-8DE9-FE41D16EB320Q35187413-2C32A583-AD87-429F-BBD7-15E4540361FAQ38598728-C270760F-097F-49F5-A93D-13D9B083FB5BQ39267908-9112427D-E0B5-4804-B9A2-24DB8E880817Q40236969-9B06E106-BA5A-445F-A3AA-817975097F8AQ46178389-ACBE8067-1118-4474-84AB-608C442EAE01Q51582113-D586A057-D63F-4CFA-BD3D-4996CDFE840DQ56983903-66C35EE6-E4E4-4A4D-8897-54AFD65CEE4BQ57009407-E89317D1-FB63-4C46-A891-A993B523D43FQ57009421-AF381B6C-0BC4-4DEC-951E-E7463B113801Q57013743-D2095172-18D9-45C6-A41D-965D5093CB18Q57014000-E8B98859-631B-469F-BB50-BE883FAC2F5AQ57062578-087F7EE3-700B-49FA-8398-EFE3652C0961Q57209697-79D9A680-245C-4DC7-8855-BA0AB7C5FBD2
P2860
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
description
article
@en
im August 2011 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в серпні 2011
@uk
name
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@en
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@nl
type
label
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@en
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@nl
prefLabel
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@en
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?
@en
P2093
Christopher T. Rota
Jason M. Evans
Richard L. Hutto
Robert J. Fletcher
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1600-0587.2010.06433.X
P577
2011-08-01T00:00:00Z