Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
about
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after strokeSpeech and language therapy for aphasia following strokeTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients after strokeTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients after strokeSpeech and language therapy for aphasia following strokeSpeech and language therapy for aphasia following strokeThe need for harmonisation and innovation of neuropsychological assessment in neurodegenerative dementias in Europe: consensus document of the Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Diseases Working GroupCommunicative-Pragmatic Assessment Is Sensitive and Time-Effective in Measuring the Outcome of Aphasia Therapy.Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.Aphasic speech with and without SentenceShaper: Two methods for assessing informativenessTools and early management of language and swallowing disorders in acute stroke patients.Should pantomime and gesticulation be assessed separately for their comprehensibility in aphasia? A case study.Optimal timing of speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: more evidence needed.Self- and surrogate-reported communication functioning in aphasia.The Role of the BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism in Recovery of Aphasia After Stroke.Constraint and multimodal approaches to therapy for chronic aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The novel language-systematic aphasia screening SAPS: screening-based therapy in combination with computerised home training.Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: both language and cognitive status are key predictors.A computerised communication aid in severe aphasia: an exploratory study.Predictors of life situation among significant others of depressed or aphasic stroke patients.Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcomeIs it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia interventionTowards a quantitative measure of verbal effectiveness and efficiency in the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT)Patients with aphasia and an infarct in Wernicke’s area benefit from early intensive speech and language therapyPrediction of everyday verbal communicative ability of aphasic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitationDeficit-oriented treatment of word-finding problems: Another replicationThe impact of linguistic deficits on verbal communicationThe effectiveness of Speech–Music Therapy for Aphasia (SMTA) in five speakers with Apraxia of Speech and aphasiaAnalysing the language therapy process: The implicit role of learning and memoryMeasuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisationAssessing functional communication: validation of the Italian versions of the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scales for speakers and caregiversThe development of a procedure for the evaluation of communication occurring between residents in long-term care and their caregiversSeverity of aphasia and recovery after treatment in patients with strokeFunctional imaging studies of treatment‐induced recovery in chronic aphasiaAchieving conversational success in aphasia by focusing on non-linguistic cognitive skills: A potentially promising new approach
P2860
Q24188072-6A7AA00C-73C8-416C-AE0E-4BF78A7F73B3Q24197761-80362C29-9929-4537-A8CF-13D9976D4981Q24200768-53C81601-823C-49E9-AF17-E1E9F004F40BQ24201810-1DD869E0-7051-45A0-A641-B09E5294265DQ24235418-C1CC8104-9A39-4DA5-8D03-C01E51A552EFQ26471566-4699906C-4815-4E54-9C05-ED319A1487CDQ33568361-D77F21F9-360F-4E43-B4D2-7833991ADD2CQ33705151-F2D14D71-CE0D-4738-923A-A081AB932ABFQ36782555-BAA08EA8-2743-4065-88FA-1D5BE1E6A28DQ36928411-DB0A576B-3D01-4690-B6FF-768145DF35F3Q37960836-4AE37BD5-7CA6-46F4-B43B-58D8E9AA504EQ38442095-ACBE7AA8-7210-4C28-86A4-00E30A184FE4Q38531620-26035196-D1E8-4C45-95CC-CD27198F5FD6Q46531479-DD22D1F5-665E-4469-99C6-F30D65587C44Q48150415-C6F782AB-07D1-4262-B6F2-54EE19155C43Q48334423-A5E475C4-01CE-4D2C-9DC7-22EC9F871603Q50099719-EE0EDE9D-F013-4E76-931B-43DB9ED24C40Q50149099-5135A9CE-9860-4931-B348-B2D96254B022Q50913305-BF21480A-9ABF-4687-A604-34A69F22AAB8Q51890773-683C3127-D92D-45FF-9155-D1C3C11CB23BQ56038500-040D2C04-A24F-4B88-A81F-13A38E721D55Q57736110-9B9EA3C8-280A-43EC-B7CB-2F4DE868BCF7Q58131118-13F94C41-EECD-4565-84E5-5029D025AB64Q58144253-D5ED1A01-FD50-4AFF-8E49-3B77D352D676Q58172366-4244F371-5E26-4C7C-9646-6DCB4B2EEC6FQ58175254-CB24B15B-9969-4866-A3F0-1C00AF9EDB7EQ58253091-50939108-5DAD-42AD-95DD-498F7BD9ABA8Q58254323-A27DA75B-865C-4EE9-80C1-AAE9A307D236Q58258316-602A788B-FE73-466D-8E2D-8E2F5FDA63DDQ58270967-94BC035D-A630-4C3F-A9E7-E1A0D4B6EACDQ58274721-B33878EF-B3AB-44A1-94B6-52908F9E77D8Q58276048-739CA6BF-7011-424B-B033-D987DDA883AFQ58277069-5E19C998-7F1C-4EF9-82AA-891A5286B3AFQ58301034-BB885969-53B6-4AD6-9965-D223028127E3Q58308925-DFA081F5-DE61-4DEA-8E8E-5344FA08D0AF
P2860
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
description
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 1994
@uk
name
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@en
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@nl
type
label
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@en
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@nl
prefLabel
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@en
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test:construction, reliability and validity
@en
P2093
Ch. Koster
J. Schokker
L. Blomert
M. L. Kean
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/02687039408248666
P577
1994-07-01T00:00:00Z