Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.
about
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationA comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 panel members' financial associations with industry: a pernicious problem persistsSafety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavityReporting bias in medical research - a narrative reviewBias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsHuman recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsisHuman recombinant protein C for severe sepsis and septic shock in adult and paediatric patientsHuman recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsisGalactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromized patientsHow to make more published research trueSystematic reviews and health policy: the influence of a project on perinatal care since 1988Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency"They would say that, wouldn't they?" A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical researchWhy Most Clinical Research Is Not UsefulRandomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policyInadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic reviewThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationTypes of studies and research designThe Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network AnalysisObesity, the endocannabinoid system, and bias arising from pharmaceutical sponsorshipAssessment of Adverse Events in Protocols, Clinical Study Reports, and Published Papers of Trials of Orlistat: A Document AnalysisThe impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health ResearchHow evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication.Negative pressure wound therapy: potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results dataRecommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusionsNSAIDs.Evaluating systematic reviews in urology: A practical guideAchieving synthesis with meta-analysis by combining and comparing all available studies.Geographical representativeness of published and ongoing randomized controlled trials. The example of: Tobacco consumption and HIV infection.Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles.Interpreting systematic reviews: are we ready to make our own conclusions? A cross-sectional study.How Can the Evidence from Global Large-scale Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Diseases be Improved?Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic reviewFederal government food policy committees and the financial interests of the food sector.Effects of drop-out on efficacy estimates in five Cochrane reviews of popular antipsychotics for schizophrenia.Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study.Design, conduct, analysis and reporting of a multi-national placebo-controlled trial of activated protein C for persistent septic shock.Developing evidence-based dentistry skills: how to interpret randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents.
P2860
Q21092360-901EF130-0458-418B-BA61-613D59DAFE35Q21144620-17A10519-02A3-4DC8-A76C-80C5EAFC0749Q21203719-28431F0A-15C0-4ABD-A4BD-99E40084F37AQ21203744-45DE266A-F6AC-45DE-9127-90C35BD0520FQ24193207-55CBD808-E1A5-47B2-A68B-48D3A1D7AFA9Q24201123-2A2BB8B3-41FB-47D7-8FCF-73751630196BQ24202128-A63D597E-133E-40F2-B0D5-4D7F418FA880Q24235181-A62C3D7C-6B78-4E82-AB17-4A72555DD426Q24240734-12122D90-817E-4D08-960E-842077257782Q24288766-19ACF4EC-CA4C-4230-9E44-96F90993DE05Q24629050-1A473C23-499F-4CB0-B2EB-A120E8CDD8BCQ24658631-A2FE4012-A819-4878-93F6-7E62661F9236Q24673588-1ECE0FE2-F6D9-4DFF-A338-59269E5A315FQ24707972-EF363295-C915-41FD-BFC9-02271EEE1575Q26784106-44424E44-3BB6-4E47-B5BF-FDD8AA6AFD7EQ26995526-47B620D1-D947-4A0F-9725-A1433EDFA1BFQ27860581-49948D9D-331E-4022-A28F-6A37D23B61CEQ28078406-972A6DF3-4880-4026-895E-613DC78190A7Q28390426-812FB6BF-86E0-43F7-912E-8E3CB0B170B0Q28475155-C367E320-161D-46C3-995E-150A01BD828DQ28553552-6E1AFB2B-BC61-425F-BC38-F362F6F58864Q28651730-112A49B8-C87B-4E09-B4AA-334F9F0D40FCQ30362457-BCDB45BD-3CB9-4EBB-AF07-9C5C6CB5B6E1Q31146292-F00B35FA-1AEC-4955-AD36-950CA691410CQ33329705-08D8AFA5-F176-44A3-8F16-46E3FF1DAF61Q33368267-8EE9DBB9-137C-446E-85D4-F56E439E9A7CQ33448171-715DEB6D-A734-46B7-8FAF-122949BF97C3Q33498513-DB21BE79-FD14-4729-B796-277353B85678Q33722336-7FAC5BBA-BDAE-4F50-B0F8-EDAAA0ACDB11Q33828691-F6C0A65F-5347-48AC-A8C6-2A7DDABE34FCQ33851285-E0C660AD-2A2C-4215-9696-1CFC4A0BBBFBQ33857706-0866F7B0-3F69-412C-8EE5-2777D0973196Q33946028-B4EF5FCD-33E7-49C7-967C-5662B952CCA6Q34105156-253104EE-D483-44E3-8FDA-6F35BA897C40Q34166764-9EF0DB65-49A9-4581-8C0A-D7CC14AC0124Q34266750-B6E653A8-541B-415F-8087-E38E357A46D4Q34294990-245DEF19-B45F-448D-B0D0-294ABC7C3763Q34370297-E8C582B4-2D86-4685-AFB5-B6436079FB4DQ34423182-819D4406-A0BB-4744-A521-25DE222B4233Q34540059-6F9A48AB-AEE9-42CB-B731-0ACFADC28CC1
P2860
Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2006 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
name
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@ast
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@en
type
label
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@ast
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@en
prefLabel
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@ast
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Cochrane reviews compared with ...... same drugs: systematic review.
@en
P2093
Anders W Jørgensen
Jørgen Hilden
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.38973.444699.0B
P407
P577
2006-10-06T00:00:00Z