Patients' ratings of family physician practices on the internet: usage and associations with conventional measures of quality in the English National Health Service
about
Promoting and maintaining physical activity in the transition to retirement: a systematic review of interventions for adults around retirement ageSocial media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care: a scoping reviewThe Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician ReviewsTweets about hospital quality: a mixed methods study.Harnessing the power of social media in optimizing health outcomes.Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating Website: an analysis of the ratings.The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in ChinaIdentifying Quality Indicators Used by Patients to Choose Secondary Health Care Providers: A Mixed Methods ApproachA cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.General Practitioners' Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England.Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?Exploring Patients' Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online.Assessing Quality of Care and Elder Abuse in Nursing Homes via Google Reviews.Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year PeriodEngland's Experience incorporating "anecdotal" reports from consumers into their national reporting system: lessons for the United States of what to do or not to do?Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians' Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study.A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review.How Online Quality Ratings Influence Patients' Choice of Medical Providers: Controlled Experimental Survey Study.Online Patient Ratings Are Not Correlated with Total Knee Replacement Surgeon-Specific OutcomesPublic Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England
P2860
Q26772912-1567B0A1-84A0-411B-AC47-79F7720AF0F6Q26823252-6DDC22F6-4EB0-4C55-94CF-BFA2D4614815Q28076904-5D2E3BB9-3A0C-4E5A-9A5A-2B572944DF37Q34238749-BE59FFE2-343A-473F-AE29-661EFE1A608EQ34588042-C7B807AF-D960-4315-A86F-7C55ED823EB1Q35055770-3DF00D7F-F9BA-429E-985A-241A73EFCF59Q35922188-7F4F7D55-CB40-4ACE-AD40-BEB56AA96AFCQ35922251-244E2C4B-1EAE-4582-9111-08628B62E506Q36092199-BAF4EAAE-F42D-41DC-9228-EE4564FE79A0Q36440845-8E9080C2-D567-42F8-823C-7694AF267FD9Q37057050-50EDCC6E-611E-42C7-9202-33B6B504CA4CQ37191906-683A9B94-0AA5-4D21-8D7C-4FB5C484FAD2Q37306807-E7433C92-CEB9-4265-AAD9-304BADFB0749Q37344957-51A92E60-57BC-4857-9C6A-2CCC17258448Q37636166-A1B907F4-BA58-4450-B467-55DF26B9AD94Q37731375-E47FAB72-8F9C-4A76-BDF3-364CAB9A9E14Q41334226-C791211B-1164-4151-B774-997B88949FD9Q46759524-964F15FC-0D55-4238-8D3F-8F2F10396F7CQ47138472-40E469C8-F474-4E79-A952-565AAC334E02Q47264042-A9E31D8D-A8ED-4A2D-958B-3B5681BFD91EQ48103638-9A6A8566-16BA-4790-A8BD-A729FBE62A5BQ50100184-0030EB94-4825-42CD-8F27-07364EDD7992Q53077031-B4C6D67C-AA6F-4628-BD7D-D99BBD2418EAQ56529277-279DC173-283A-4414-98AF-8DAC2CD84CFBQ57174750-4EDE8864-59D0-4408-BC13-66747D42E8B0
P2860
Patients' ratings of family physician practices on the internet: usage and associations with conventional measures of quality in the English National Health Service
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@ast
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@en
type
label
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@ast
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@en
prefLabel
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@ast
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Patients' ratings of family ph ...... nglish National Health Service
@en
P2093
Christopher Millett
Utz J Pape
P2860
P356
10.2196/JMIR.2280
P577
2012-10-17T00:00:00Z