Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
about
Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgeryComparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic reviewClinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.MASTERS-D Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic, Observational, Data-Monitored Trial of Minimally Invasive Fusion to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Disorders, One-Year Follow-Up.Ambulatory spine surgery: a survey study.Bilateral neurological deficits following unilateral minimally invasive TLIF: A review of four patientsEndoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series reportValidation and analysis of a multi-site MIS Prospective Registry through sub-analysis of an MIS TLIF SubgroupMinimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital CourseMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a perspective on current evidence and clinical knowledge.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease.Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionPerioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionMinimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidenceSurgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: open versus minimally invasive surgeryComparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease"Minimally invasive" lumbar spine surgery: a critical review.The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: A review.An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional "open" spinal surgery.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Economic Performance of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF) with a Focus on Hospital Throughput EfficiencyMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases.Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degenerationMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Results of 23 consecutive cases.Short-Term Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Pedicle Screw with Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared with Conventional Trajectory.Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionTrue anteroposterior view pedicle screw insertion technique.Clinical study of bilateral decompression via vertebral lamina fenestration for lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lower lumbar instability.Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion.Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes.Radiographic and clinical outcomes following MIS-TLIF in patients with adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis.In Reply: Meta-analysis Does Not Support Lower Complication Rates in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Fusion Is More Effective Than Open Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.The expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Two years follow-up.
P2860
Q26824183-BAAC4DF3-989F-4BC2-8A3B-63C8E1F519B2Q27014738-F05A4E77-A98F-4D3C-BD5C-BA1845A4453AQ30239932-0096BE94-91C9-4619-8C17-A35F44D3066EQ31115750-7355AA76-E535-4503-BEE5-686C02EA2C8DQ33954021-BC0EFA83-A3D7-4C44-9415-06304A6765F1Q34236146-96C9F224-1424-445A-AA92-BEB4F0A3C243Q34991888-95368A41-066A-4C92-B241-99AAD0F4B9BBQ35076093-51A5B78F-E674-4460-B48A-F68C9BB9A3B1Q35820178-08249CC0-1370-4872-82EA-33E418974C1BQ36167447-1126B135-6FD7-4C32-ADCE-C99A4096B633Q36347078-23BBA52F-4523-429D-AB9E-C44783336784Q36347117-94B453DE-C57C-41A3-9785-8CF93E296B78Q36391404-4FDE6066-E918-44D4-90BF-390251152B28Q36852346-AEBCE6FE-02AD-412C-9D18-45353A3C45ECQ37064395-442CA6AA-EC12-4C86-9CA6-0AEABBBD9EA6Q37170917-F82305D2-BF73-4F20-943F-E008FD9CD698Q37185461-3DEEB8A3-BCC0-4374-A603-FDE8A17CDDC6Q37244265-AADB07CB-30A6-45E4-B8D3-2947F9E441CCQ37350528-72039D4E-8C16-410B-A1FC-7033A7F7C27FQ37410080-952D7BEC-585C-4463-A8A9-AFF3C4D0C1E1Q37676702-EC0F6EE1-900C-4F07-86CB-C1B6DB5DCD56Q37870826-72C05B18-2082-4DCA-B1D8-AB63796CBDB7Q38035861-D48C009B-A308-436B-B222-D9C7650CF3EAQ38388749-F4EDC673-B785-46B4-9699-9B3C421F6B44Q38392329-C6341D9D-DE67-42F4-BAE1-35CD63522CD6Q38562327-17B81982-01D9-4B20-951E-7A7373E55129Q39119037-884211EA-1C46-4A5A-B1D4-46F21C5C3527Q40909763-D2783A73-F32F-4E7E-A143-0314EC1A1073Q41769728-FA2F254C-A4EC-4752-AD91-EEB194AE2C46Q41867060-CE086D92-3BF9-4562-813D-1A441644E4A2Q41906241-DFBE15E4-DD98-4B0F-A8E2-186E0E50886FQ41918790-FA71B79C-D03B-4465-9EAD-1388EE1893E8Q42430225-3E42850B-F13D-4D8B-96A4-0D210F1BDBC9Q43246765-ECEEA6D2-A948-4220-B9DD-FA1F23482BCBQ47103694-525298A7-79FE-44B8-A289-E4F1F9DE6FB8Q53006376-BE928993-036D-410F-96F7-939716A4C21BQ53829026-039EE66D-72F2-47B1-B8DE-7F9EC3FCF38DQ54146448-A6977592-A817-4265-B1A3-40F66DA3B818Q54214808-30E1E4A2-E1F2-4041-9B63-0AF7E532250DQ55168073-8D2AD084-14F5-48EE-8EE4-376983F62728
P2860
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@nl
type
label
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@nl
prefLabel
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
P2093
Alan T Villavicencio
Alexander Mason
Cassandra M Roeca
E Lee Nelson
Sigita Burneikiene
P2860
P356
10.4103/2152-7806.63905
P407
P577
2010-05-31T00:00:00Z