Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

about

Cardiac operative risk evaluation: The EuroSCORE II, does it make a real difference?Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery.

P2860

Q36449086-F2D26EE0-5D6B-4B5B-B555-D73F27B639F2 Q47940793-EF3B9B8D-5BC4-44CA-97A6-325A29AEFF6F

P2860

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42532887

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年論文

@yue

2010年論文

@zh-hant

2010年論文

@zh-hk

2010年論文

@zh-mo

2010年論文

@zh-tw

2010年论文

@wuu

2010年论文

@zh

2010年论文

@zh-cn

name

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@en

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@nl

type

Item

label

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@en

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@nl

prefLabel

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@en

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@nl

P1476

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

@en

P2093

A F T M Verhagen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

H A van Swieten

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

H B van Wetten

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

L Noyez

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M W A Verkroost

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P C Kievit

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Evaluating the quality of medical care.

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part I: where do they come from?

Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?

Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article.

The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators.

A hospital-randomized controlled trial of an educational quality improvement intervention in rural and small community hospitals in Texas following implementation of information technology.

Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare.

Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Is no news good news? Organized follow-up, an absolute necessity for the evaluation of myocardial revascularization.

The importance of an organized follow-up for the evaluation of mortality after hospital discharge in cardiac surgery.

P2888

bf03091793

P304

365-369

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/BF03091793

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

7-8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2010-08-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

45800422

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20730004

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

cardiac surgery

P932

2922783

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

about

P2860

P2860

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932