Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
about
Disutility of illness for caregivers and families: a systematic review of the literatureTHE VALUE OF CHOICE IN PUBLIC POLICYThe effects of an integrated care intervention for the frail elderly on informal caregivers: a quasi-experimental study.Dementia care initiative in primary practice: study protocol of a cluster randomized trial on dementia management in a general practice setting.Predictors of long-term care utilization by Dutch hospital patients aged 65+Measuring the impact of caregiving on informal carers: a construct validation study of the CarerQol instrumentWell-being losses due to care-givingWho is responsible for providing care? Investigating the role of care tasks and past experiences in a cross-sectional survey in the Netherlands.Estimation of a preference-based carer experience scale.Caring for a child with autism spectrum disorder and parents' quality of life: application of the CarerQol.A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: measuring the impact of informal care giving.Willingness to pay for informal care in France: the value of funding support interventions for caregiversAssessing health-related quality-of-life changes in informal caregivers: an evaluation in parents of children with major congenital anomaliesSurvey nonresponse among informal caregivers: effects on the presence and magnitude of associations with caregiver burden and satisfaction.Psychological distress and mental health of Thai caregiversEvidence of spillover of illness among household members: EQ-5D scores from a US sample.A critical evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions for improving the well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review protocol."I have got something positive out of this situation": psychological benefits of caregiving in relatives of young people with muscular dystrophy.Measuring Care-Related Quality of Life of Caregivers for Use in Economic Evaluations: CarerQol Tariffs for Australia, Germany, Sweden, UK, and US.Measuring the loss of consumer choice in mandatory health programmes using discrete choice experiments.Using the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle.Hurdles that impede economic evaluations of welfare interventions."It Has Changed My Life": An Exploration of Caregiver Experiences in Serious Illness.Informal care: choice or constraint?The Valuation of Informal Care in Cost-of-Illness Studies: A Systematic Review.The insights of health and welfare professionals on hurdles that impede economic evaluations of welfare interventions.Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity.Double-duty caregivers: healthcare professionals juggling employment and informal caregiving. A survey on personal health and work experiences.Sustaining Chicago's Informal Caregivers: an Age-Friendly ApproachMonetising the provision of informal long-term care by elderly people: estimates for European out-of-home caregivers based on the well-being valuation method.Predicting carer health effects for use in economic evaluation.Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study.Paid carers' experiences of caring for mechanically ventilated children at home: implications for services and training.Caring and retirement: crossroads and consequences.Informal eldercare and work-related strain.Do Pills Have No Ills? Capturing the Impact of Direct Treatment Disutility.Validation of the Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument in different study settings: findings from The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS).How to include informal care in economic evaluations.Providing Informal Care in Terminal Illness: An Analysis of Preferences for Support Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.Voice and choice in health care in England: understanding citizen responses to dissatisfaction.
P2860
Q26865261-21F965FA-85DF-45A3-8465-44416C8AE96DQ29038137-DFB12ED3-8AEB-42DA-98F9-8228ADF6AF2EQ30578019-10B6C1D6-4D6C-49AE-8814-0AE6A24F4CB7Q33461875-1D482523-AEF7-473E-A82B-95F4B4804C70Q33574961-42DFD4A2-0774-4FF4-B80E-24004DBE2E8FQ33588121-AEBB1A4A-E53F-4730-B82F-5D6659712756Q33735585-6F57D7CD-944C-4C31-A982-4D616C52D85AQ33893344-535A2031-365B-4AF1-BB9A-7BEEBED052D1Q34141946-E9404AC0-3FE0-40AD-9B10-B3F90B93FD80Q34204053-A85A9877-71C8-4BEA-8CE7-C383835F5185Q35585563-58645F8D-03FA-49F1-B71D-D81712792626Q35851054-3975D058-9693-4F5C-9DBA-40F9F27748AEQ35947402-B12E3A94-B7E8-4D11-88C3-8B47945988ACQ36045653-DB9B471C-D055-4D57-B244-DE1F4DB88ED9Q36618987-FCD5DE34-9635-45DA-A770-DDBFF0F9A618Q36711872-04A0FA1E-B111-4C01-B0CA-A75F287A0974Q37093778-B2C91B6E-75F1-40B5-86D7-1C07C6BA26D2Q37491401-1A433E38-DD89-42AD-9322-D26869542C88Q37710146-DA6076C6-B1A8-4048-B993-1C14EB355E18Q38089700-7259C86A-1F05-4E4D-985C-F982F312C839Q38134667-DEE5ADAE-83D1-40AF-BD07-5CA1C12C616BQ38472247-F9D4B97A-8BF4-4E54-9BEB-87C48C0BD832Q38557857-FDFBD3CA-F616-4957-9D21-67EC73FFAE87Q38841090-15BAD51A-D4FA-48C6-BBF6-5E0804F389C4Q39009810-309B34D3-5B71-4982-BD38-2939615E0956Q39090440-A871A46E-ACDC-47A2-832D-A8B5115C999FQ39843522-764D4C40-8F8B-40E5-952D-AC2C22F8F266Q40154233-16A374D2-2BB8-4394-8217-726E9D5F99E6Q40381039-5DD701F3-78ED-4742-8EEF-B5A98A58B59AQ40977988-9DD24B4A-B9DE-422C-97E4-B8482C433800Q41982214-160E026A-693D-4F25-B865-A39028280402Q42374531-7DDFDB0B-6C72-4988-B535-988D019AB9FDQ42600959-75D3E840-0447-4675-BFCB-A6450BE1B981Q43429199-D1357168-7EC7-4573-8A10-84D8DAA612F2Q43641533-9305C154-3AC8-4050-811C-83CDCA807DCFQ44207345-7FF38343-8955-4C20-A53B-54C56588AF3AQ44309219-BB35814F-1871-4853-9BDF-11AE4884AE55Q44709103-F3428B1F-9080-4999-A398-5A9A81AD9E77Q44723720-EBE678EB-BCAE-4760-9449-89E3B5AF935DQ44801393-641F48D1-C4AB-4C22-B294-6BE75F9EAEAD
P2860
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
@en
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
@nl
type
label
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
@en
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
@nl
prefLabel
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
@en
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring.
@nl
P50
P1433
P1476
Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring
@en
P2093
Geertruidis A M van den Bos
Marc A Koopmanschap
P356
10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2004.12.008
P577
2005-01-08T00:00:00Z