Arizona v. Gant
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured.
Wikipage disambiguates
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Arizona v. Gant
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured.
has abstract
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 ...... ave been arrested and secured.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
19,694,889
Wikipage revision ID
736,147,356
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
JoinDissent
Roberts, Kennedy ; Breyer
JoinMajority
Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
Litigants
Arizona v. Gant
majority
ParallelCitations
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 ...... ave been arrested and secured.
@en
label
Arizona v. Gant
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
State of Arizona, Petitioner v. Rodney Joseph Gant
@en