BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings is a leading judgment of the Privy Council which summarised the test for whether a term should implied ‘in fact’ into a contract, to give effect to the intentions of the contracting parties. While the formulation of the test is not without criticism, it is usually accepted as setting out the tests for the implication of a term into a contract.
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings is a leading judgment of the Privy Council which summarised the test for whether a term should implied ‘in fact’ into a contract, to give effect to the intentions of the contracting parties. While the formulation of the test is not without criticism, it is usually accepted as setting out the tests for the implication of a term into a contract.
has abstract
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty ...... ion of a term into a contract.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
51,893,075
Wikipage revision ID
743,175,596
citations
date decided
1977-07-27
full name
BP Refinery Pty Ltd v President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Hastings
imagesize
judges
keywords
General contractual principles ...... on of contracts, Implied terms
name
BP Refinery Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings
opinions
(Viscount Dilhorne, Lord Simon and Lord Keith)
a term should be implied in th ...... he rights within the BP group.
subject
comment
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty ...... ion of a term into a contract.
@en
label
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings
@en