Brewer v. Williams
Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes "waiver" of the right to counsel for the purposes of the Sixth Amendment. Under Miranda v. Arizona, evidence obtained by police during interrogation of a suspect before he has been read his Miranda rights is inadmissible. Here, however, the defendant had been indicted in court, and thus his Sixth Amendment right to counsel had automatically attached. At issue was whether a voluntary admission of incriminating facts in response to police statements constituted a waiver of this right to counsel.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Brewer v. Williams
Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes "waiver" of the right to counsel for the purposes of the Sixth Amendment. Under Miranda v. Arizona, evidence obtained by police during interrogation of a suspect before he has been read his Miranda rights is inadmissible. Here, however, the defendant had been indicted in court, and thus his Sixth Amendment right to counsel had automatically attached. At issue was whether a voluntary admission of incriminating facts in response to police statements constituted a waiver of this right to counsel.
has abstract
Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 3 ...... iver of this right to counsel.
@en
Wikipage page ID
29,825,473
Wikipage revision ID
724,050,170
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
Marshall, Powell, Stevens
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
Miranda safeguards come into p ...... o its "functional equivalent."
JoinDissent
Blackmun, Rehnquist
White, Rehnquist
JoinMajority
Brennan, Marshall, Powell, Stevens
Litigants
Brewer v. Williams
majority
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 3 ...... iver of this right to counsel.
@en
label
Brewer v. Williams
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Brewer, Warden v. Williams
@en