Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the Sixteenth Amendment to, the United States Constitution, allowing a federal income tax. The Sixteenth Amendment had been ratified earlier in 1913. The Revenue Act of 1913 imposed income taxes that were not apportioned among the states according to each state's population.
240 U.S. 1Brushaber v. Union PacificBrushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co.Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. R. CoBrushaber v. Union Pacific R. R. Co.Brushaber v. Union Pacific R R CoBrushaber v. Union Pacific R R Co.Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadBrushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyBrushaber v Union Pacific RailroadFrank Brushaber v. Union PacificFrank Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadFrank Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyFrank R. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the Sixteenth Amendment to, the United States Constitution, allowing a federal income tax. The Sixteenth Amendment had been ratified earlier in 1913. The Revenue Act of 1913 imposed income taxes that were not apportioned among the states according to each state's population.
has abstract
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rai ...... ng to each state's population.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
728,669,144
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
The Sixteenth Amendment remove ...... on 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
JoinMajority
justia
Litigants
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad
ParallelCitations
Prior
Dismissed by the District Court for the Southern District of New York
SCOTUS
Subsequent
subject
comment
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Rai ...... ng to each state's population.
@en
label
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Frank R. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
@en