California Proposition 90 (2006)
California Proposition 90 was a 2006 ballot initiative in the state of California, United States. Passing of the initiative would have made two changes to California law:
* Eminent domain could not be used by government except to provide facilities for public use, to abate specific public nuisances, and to act in a declared state of emergency. (This was a reaction to the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London.)
* Government would be required to reimburse property owners whose property value is decreased as a result of any government regulation or action.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
California Proposition 90 (2006)
California Proposition 90 was a 2006 ballot initiative in the state of California, United States. Passing of the initiative would have made two changes to California law:
* Eminent domain could not be used by government except to provide facilities for public use, to abate specific public nuisances, and to act in a declared state of emergency. (This was a reaction to the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London.)
* Government would be required to reimburse property owners whose property value is decreased as a result of any government regulation or action.
has abstract
California Proposition 90 was ...... egon Ballot Measure 37 (2004).
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
640,450,139
hypernym
type
comment
California Proposition 90 was ...... vernment regulation or action.
@en
label
California Proposition 90 (2006)
@en