Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America, 17 Cal.4th 670, 952 P.2d 218, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 410 (1998), was a landmark case which upheld the right of a private organization in California to not allow new members on the basis of their sexual orientation. Its companion case was Randall v. Orange County Council, 17 Cal.4th 736, 952 P.2d 261, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 453 (1998). Psychiatrist and lawyer Richard Green was co-counsel for Curran.
Wikipage redirect
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America, 17 Cal.4th 670, 952 P.2d 218, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 410 (1998), was a landmark case which upheld the right of a private organization in California to not allow new members on the basis of their sexual orientation. Its companion case was Randall v. Orange County Council, 17 Cal.4th 736, 952 P.2d 261, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 453 (1998). Psychiatrist and lawyer Richard Green was co-counsel for Curran.
has abstract
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council ...... een was co-counsel for Curran.
@en
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council ...... de leur orientation sexuelle.
@fr
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
744,293,652
citations
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Fullname
Timothy Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America
Holding
The Boy Scouts of America are ...... e Court of Appeal is affirmed.
JoinMajority
Kennard, Baxter, Chin
LawsApplied
Unruh Civil Rights Act
Litigants
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America
majority
Prior
subject
comment
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council ...... een was co-counsel for Curran.
@en
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council ...... de leur orientation sexuelle.
@fr
label
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America
@en
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council
@fr