De Veau v. Braisted
De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144 (1960) is a 5-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that an interstate compact restricting convicted felons from holding union office is not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act or the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the Constitution.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
De Veau v. Braisted
De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144 (1960) is a 5-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that an interstate compact restricting convicted felons from holding union office is not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act or the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the Constitution.
has abstract
De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. ...... ection 10 of the Constitution.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
29,327,016
Wikipage revision ID
663,622,663
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
An interstate compact restrict ...... rticle One of the Constitution
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Clark, Whittaker, Stewart
LawsApplied
National Labor Relations Act; ...... ution, Article Four, Section 1
Litigants
De Veau v. Braisted
majority
NotParticipating
Prior
On appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York
SCOTUS
subject
comment
De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. ...... ection 10 of the Constitution.
@en
label
De Veau v. Braisted
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
De Veau v. Braisted
@en