FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n, 577 U.S. ___ (2016) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had the authority to regulate demand response transactions. Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in this case was the last opinion he wrote before his death in February 2016.
primaryTopic
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n, 577 U.S. ___ (2016) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had the authority to regulate demand response transactions. Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in this case was the last opinion he wrote before his death in February 2016.
has abstract
FERC v. Electric Power Supply ...... re his death in February 2016.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
49,495,077
Wikipage revision ID
714,296,667
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
Docket
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
LawsApplied
Litigants
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n
NotParticipating
Prior
On Writ of Certiorari to the U ...... e District of Columbia Circuit
SCOTUS
subject
comment
FERC v. Electric Power Supply ...... re his death in February 2016.
@en
label
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association et al.
@en