Griswold v. Connecticut
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), is a landmark case in the United States in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Constitution protected a right to privacy. The case involved a Connecticut "Comstock law" that prohibited any person from using "any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception." By a vote of 7–2, the Supreme Court invalidated the law on the grounds that it violated the "right to marital privacy", establishing the basis for the right to privacy with respect to intimate practices. This and other cases view the right to privacy as a right to "protect[ion] from governmental intrusion."
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
Griswold v. Connecticut
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), is a landmark case in the United States in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Constitution protected a right to privacy. The case involved a Connecticut "Comstock law" that prohibited any person from using "any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception." By a vote of 7–2, the Supreme Court invalidated the law on the grounds that it violated the "right to marital privacy", establishing the basis for the right to privacy with respect to intimate practices. This and other cases view the right to privacy as a right to "protect[ion] from governmental intrusion."
has abstract
Griswold v. Connecticut ist ei ...... g. Red States hoch umstritten.
@de
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U ...... e droit à l'intimité maritale.
@fr
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U ...... sed on the due process clause.
@en
Грисвольд против Коннектикута ...... икута, стало Роу против Уэйда.
@ru
thumbnail
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
742,081,851
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Griswold v. Connecticut , 381 U.S. 479
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
A Connecticut law criminalizin ...... cticut Supreme Court reversed.
JoinConcurrence
Warren, Brennan
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Warren, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg
justia
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amends. I, III, IV, V, IX, XIV; Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53-32, 54–196
Litigants
Griswold v. Connecticut
majority
other source
other url
Prior
SCOTUS
Subsequent
subject
comment
Griswold v. Connecticut ist ei ...... g. Red States hoch umstritten.
@de
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U ...... e droit à l'intimité maritale.
@fr
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U ...... from governmental intrusion."
@en
Грисвольд против Коннектикута ...... икута, стало Роу против Уэйда.
@ru
label
Griswold v. Connecticut
@de
Griswold v. Connecticut
@en
Griswold v. Connecticut
@fr
Грисвольд против Коннектикута
@ru
seeAlso
wasDerivedFrom
depiction
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Estelle T. Griswold and C. Lee Buxton v. Connecticut
@en