Hill v. McDonough
Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case challenging the use of lethal injection as a form of execution in the state of Florida. The Court ruled unanimously that a challenge to the method of execution as violating the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution properly raised a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a cause of action for civil rights violations, rather than under the habeas corpus provisions. Accordingly, that the prisoner had previously sought habeas relief could not bar the present challenge.
547 U.S. 573Carence E. Hill v. James R. McDonough, Interim Secretary, FL Department of Corrections, et al.Carence E. Hill v. James R. McDonough, Interim Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.Clarence Hill v. James McDonoughClarence hill v. james mcdonoughClarence hill v james mcdonoughHill v. CrosbyHill v. mcdonoughHill v McDonoughHill v mcdonough
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Hill v. McDonough
Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case challenging the use of lethal injection as a form of execution in the state of Florida. The Court ruled unanimously that a challenge to the method of execution as violating the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution properly raised a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a cause of action for civil rights violations, rather than under the habeas corpus provisions. Accordingly, that the prisoner had previously sought habeas relief could not bar the present challenge.
has abstract
Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 57 ...... not bar the present challenge.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
715,285,764
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
Because a death row prisoner's ...... Appeals reversed and remanded.
JoinMajority
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amend. VIII; U.S. Const. amend. XIV; 28 U.S.C. § 2244;
Litigants
Hill v. McDonough
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 57 ...... not bar the present challenge.
@en
label
Hill v. McDonough
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Clarence E. Hill, Petitioner v ...... artment of Corrections, et al.
@en