Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), marked the United States Supreme Court's recognition of certain forms of sexual harassment as a violation of Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII, and established the standards for analyzing whether conduct was unlawful and when an employer would be liable.
primaryTopic
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), marked the United States Supreme Court's recognition of certain forms of sexual harassment as a violation of Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII, and established the standards for analyzing whether conduct was unlawful and when an employer would be liable.
has abstract
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson ...... n an employer would be liable.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
723,084,065
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
A claim of "hostile environmen ...... the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
JoinConcurrence
Brennan, Blackmun, Stevens
JoinMajority
Burger, White, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
majority
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson ...... n an employer would be liable.
@en
label
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Mechelle Vinson, et al.
@en