Skipper v. South Carolina
Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule from Lockett v. Ohio (1978) dictated that mitigating evidence not be subject to limitations based on relevance.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Skipper v. South Carolina
Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule from Lockett v. Ohio (1978) dictated that mitigating evidence not be subject to limitations based on relevance.
has abstract
Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 ...... imitations based on relevance.
@en
Wikipage page ID
44,541,445
Wikipage revision ID
723,080,847
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
The trial court's exclusion fr ...... e in mitigation of punishment.
JoinConcurrence
Burger, Rehnquist
JoinMajority
Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor
LawsApplied
Litigants
Skipper v. South Carolina
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 ...... imitations based on relevance.
@en
label
Skipper v. South Carolina
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Skipper v. South Carolina
@en