Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.
Smiley v. Citibank, (517 U.S. 735), is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a regulation of the Comptroller of Currency which included credit card late fees and other penalties within the definition of interest and thus prevented individual states from limiting them when charged by nationally-chartered banks. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the regulation was reasonable enough under the Court's own Chevron standard for the justices to defer to the Comptroller.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.
Smiley v. Citibank, (517 U.S. 735), is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a regulation of the Comptroller of Currency which included credit card late fees and other penalties within the definition of interest and thus prevented individual states from limiting them when charged by nationally-chartered banks. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the regulation was reasonable enough under the Court's own Chevron standard for the justices to defer to the Comptroller.
has abstract
Smiley v. Citibank, (517 U.S. ...... ed regret for his involvement.
@en
Wikipage page ID
19,099,987
Wikipage revision ID
720,600,122
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
Comptroller of Currency regula ...... by nationally-chartered banks
JoinMajority
LawsApplied
Litigants
Smiley v. Citibank
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Smiley v. Citibank, (517 U.S. ...... s to defer to the Comptroller.
@en
label
Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.
@en