Walkovszky v. Carlton
Walkovszky v. Carlton, 223 N.E.2d 6 (NY 1966), is a United States corporate law decision on the conditions under which Courts may pierce the corporate veil. A cab company had shielded itself from liability by incorporating each cab as its own corporation. The New York Court of Appeals refused to pierce the veil on account of undercapitalization alone.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Walkovszky v. Carlton
Walkovszky v. Carlton, 223 N.E.2d 6 (NY 1966), is a United States corporate law decision on the conditions under which Courts may pierce the corporate veil. A cab company had shielded itself from liability by incorporating each cab as its own corporation. The New York Court of Appeals refused to pierce the veil on account of undercapitalization alone.
has abstract
Walkovszky v. Carlton, 223 N.E ...... of undercapitalization alone.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
731,203,280
citations
date decided
1966-11-29
date filed
1966-09-26
full name
John Walkovszky, Respondent, v. William Carlton, Appellant, et al., Defendants
name
Walkovszky v. Carlton
opinions
Fuld: Reversed lower court.
prior actions
subsequent actions
subject
comment
Walkovszky v. Carlton, 223 N.E ...... of undercapitalization alone.
@en
label
Walkovszky v. Carlton
@en
