1937 Australian referendum (Marketing)
Constitution Alteration (Marketing) 1936 was an Australian referendum held in the 1937 referendums which sought to alter the Australian Constitution to remove the restraints on interstate sales of goods imposed on Parliament by section 92 of the Constitution. It was proposed to add a section 92A that excluded "marketing" from the powers of section 92. This was in reaction to the case of James v Commonwealth [1932] AC 578 in which the Privy Council found that the Commonwealth legislation regulating the sales of dried fruit was invalid.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
1937 Australian referendum (Marketing)
Constitution Alteration (Marketing) 1936 was an Australian referendum held in the 1937 referendums which sought to alter the Australian Constitution to remove the restraints on interstate sales of goods imposed on Parliament by section 92 of the Constitution. It was proposed to add a section 92A that excluded "marketing" from the powers of section 92. This was in reaction to the case of James v Commonwealth [1932] AC 578 in which the Privy Council found that the Commonwealth legislation regulating the sales of dried fruit was invalid.
has abstract
Constitution Alteration (Marke ...... es of dried fruit was invalid.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,004,960,388
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Constitution Alteration (Marke ...... es of dried fruit was invalid.
@en
label
1937 Australian referendum (Marketing)
@en