2015 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eighteen per curiam opinions during its 2015 term, which began October 5, 2015 and concluded October 2, 2016. Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on the Court at the time the decision was handed down are assumed to have participated and concurred unless otherwise noted.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
2015 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eighteen per curiam opinions during its 2015 term, which began October 5, 2015 and concluded October 2, 2016. Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on the Court at the time the decision was handed down are assumed to have participated and concurred unless otherwise noted.
has abstract
The Supreme Court of the Unite ...... curred unless otherwise noted.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
48,069,378
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
878,054,209
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
datedecided
2015-10-05
2015-11-09
2015-12-14
2016-01-25
2016-03-07
2016-03-21
2016-04-04
2016-05-16
2016-05-31
fullcasename
Amgen Inc., et al. v. Steve Harris, et al.
@en
Chadrin Lee Mullenix v. Beatri ...... e of Israel Leija, Jr., et al.
@en
David A. Zubik, et al. v. Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
@en
Deborah K. Johnson, Warden v. Donna Kay Lee
@en
Jaime Caetano v. Massachusetts
@en
Jeffrey Woods, Warden v. Timothy Etherton
@en
Maryland v. James Kulbicki
@en
Melene James v. City of Boise, Idaho
@en
Michael Wearry v. Burl Cain, Warden
@en
Randy White, Warden v. Roger L. Wheeler
@en
LawsApplied
@en
Ga. Code Ann. §19–8–5
@en
U.S. Const. amend. II; Mass. Gen. Laws, ch. 140, §131J
@en
U.S. Const. amend. VI;
@en
priorhistory
-1.1899872E9
Judgment for petitioner, No. C ...... , No. 1140595, 2015 WL 5511249
@en
Petition denied, sub nom. Stat ...... review denied, No. 13-KP-2422
@en
source
official slip opinion
@en
sourceURL
summary
Alabama Supreme Court reversed ...... onclusion granting the decree.
@en
Arizona Supreme Court reversed ...... w the States' highest courts".
@en
Court of Appeals of Maryland r ...... mode of ballistics analysis."
@en
District Court of Louisiana re ...... conviction is another matter."
@en
Fifth Circuit reversed. The Co ...... the Fourth Amendment hollow."
@en
Idaho Supreme Court reversed a ...... ees to a prevailing
defendant.
@en
Ninth Circuit reversed and rem ...... etirement Income Security Act.
@en
Ninth Circuit reversed and rem ...... eas courts across the nation".
@en
Ninth Circuit reversed. The lo ...... rmed the Ninth Circuit ruling.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
The Supreme Court of the Unite ...... curred unless otherwise noted.
@en
label
2015 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
@en