A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001) was a landmark intellectual property case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, holding that defendant, peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing service Napster, could be held liable for contributory infringement and vicarious infringement of the plaintiffs' copyrights. This was the first major case to address the application of copyright laws to peer-to-peer file sharing.
2000s in the music industry239 F.3d 1004A&M RecordsA&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, IncA&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (2000)A&M Records v. NapsterA&M Records v. Napster, Inc.A&M v. NapsterA&m records v. napsterA & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.BMG Music v. GonzalezBusiness ethicsContributory copyright infringementDigital CopyrightDigital Millennium Copyright ActEarthStation 5File sharingHilary RosenIn re Aimster Copyright LitigationIntellectual Reserve, Inc. v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry, Inc.Joseph ByrdLegal aspects of file sharingList of United States courts of appeals casesList of copyright case lawList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesMarilyn Hall PatelMetallica v. Napster, Inc.Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.NapsterOnline Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation ActPerfect 10, Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'nRIAA v. NapsterSony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Streaming mediaThe American Metaphysical CircusTimeline of file sharingUMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001) was a landmark intellectual property case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, holding that defendant, peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing service Napster, could be held liable for contributory infringement and vicarious infringement of the plaintiffs' copyrights. This was the first major case to address the application of copyright laws to peer-to-peer file sharing.
has abstract
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, ...... ll others similarly situated."
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,024,331,505
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
@en
citations
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
@en
Holding
Napster could be held liable f ...... ng the District Court holding.
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
@en
majority
Robert Beezer
@en
other source
resource.org
@en
other url
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, ...... to peer-to-peer file sharing.
@en
label
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
@en