AH v West London Mental Health Trust
AH vs West London Mental Health Trust was a landmark case in England, which established a legal precedent in 2011 when Albert Laszlo Haines (AH), a patient in Broadmoor Hospital, a high security psychiatric hospital, was able to exercise a right to a fully open and public mental health review tribunal to hear his appeal for release. The case and the legal principles it affirmed have been described as opening up the secret world of tribunals and National Health Service secure units, and as having substantial ramifications for mental health professionals and solicitors, though how frequently patients will be willing or able to exercise the right is not yet clear.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
AH v West London Mental Health Trust
AH vs West London Mental Health Trust was a landmark case in England, which established a legal precedent in 2011 when Albert Laszlo Haines (AH), a patient in Broadmoor Hospital, a high security psychiatric hospital, was able to exercise a right to a fully open and public mental health review tribunal to hear his appeal for release. The case and the legal principles it affirmed have been described as opening up the secret world of tribunals and National Health Service secure units, and as having substantial ramifications for mental health professionals and solicitors, though how frequently patients will be willing or able to exercise the right is not yet clear.
has abstract
AH vs West London Mental Healt ...... munity mental health services.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
39.842.905
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1.000.414.340
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
AH vs West London Mental Healt ...... se the right is not yet clear.
@en
label
AH v West London Mental Health Trust
@en