Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the US Supreme Court that held that preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision is known as the "portal to portal case." The Supreme Court reaffirmed Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery in its 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
328 U.S. 680Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery CoAnderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery CompanyAnderson v Mount Clemens Pottery CoAnderson v Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Edward LambFair Labor Standards Act of 1938List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Stone CourtList of abrogated United States Supreme Court decisionsState Bar of MichiganUnited States labor law
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the US Supreme Court that held that preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision is known as the "portal to portal case." The Supreme Court reaffirmed Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery in its 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
has abstract
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Potter ...... No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
10,546,322
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
950,601,535
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Abrogated
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.,
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Burton
@en
fullname
Anderson, et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Preliminary work activities, i ...... nder Fair Labor Standards Act.
@en
JoinDissent
Frankfurter
@en
JoinMajority
Black, Reed, Douglas, Rutledge
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
@en
majority
Murphy
@en
NotParticipating
Jackson
@en
ParallelCitations
Prior
Subsequent
Petition for rehearing denied, .
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Potter ...... No. 14-1146 (March 22, 2016).
@en
label
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Anderson, et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
@en