Argument from religious experience
The argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of God. It holds that the best explanation for religious experiences is that they constitute genuine experience or perception of a divine reality. Various reasons have been offered for and against accepting this contention. Contemporary defenders of the argument are Richard Swinburne, William Alston, Alvin Plantinga, Alister Hardy, and Dinesh D'Souza.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Argument from religious experience
The argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of God. It holds that the best explanation for religious experiences is that they constitute genuine experience or perception of a divine reality. Various reasons have been offered for and against accepting this contention. Contemporary defenders of the argument are Richard Swinburne, William Alston, Alvin Plantinga, Alister Hardy, and Dinesh D'Souza.
has abstract
Argumen dari pengalaman religi ...... ster Hardy dan Dinesh D'Souza.
@in
Testigantza erlijiosoaren argu ...... iz, fenomeno berri samarra da.
@eu
The argument from religious ex ...... ter Hardy, and Dinesh D'Souza.
@en
حجة التجربة الدينية هي حجة لوج ...... مطلقًا لأن «الباطن لا ضابط له»
@ar
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
999,992,732
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
comment
Argumen dari pengalaman religi ...... ster Hardy dan Dinesh D'Souza.
@in
Testigantza erlijiosoaren argu ...... iz, fenomeno berri samarra da.
@eu
The argument from religious ex ...... ter Hardy, and Dinesh D'Souza.
@en
حجة التجربة الدينية هي حجة لوج ...... مطلقًا لأن «الباطن لا ضابط له»
@ar
label
Argumen dari pengalaman religius
@in
Argument from religious experience
@en
Testigantza erlijiosoaren argudio
@eu
حجة التجربة الدينية
@ar