Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 is an English law case that sets out the standard of unreasonableness of public-body decisions that would make them liable to be quashed on judicial review, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness. The court gave three conditions on which it would intervene to correct a bad administrative decision, including on grounds of its unreasonableness in the special sense later articulated in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service by Lord Diplock:
AP Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury CorpAssociated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury CorpnAssociated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury CorporationAssociated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury CorpAssociated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury CorporationWednesbury PrincipleWednesbury irrationalityWednesbury principalWednesbury unreasonableWednesbury unreasonablenessWednesbury unreasonableness principle
Wikipage redirect
1947 in the United KingdomAP Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury CorpAbebe v CommonwealthAdministrative lawAdministrative law in SingaporeAssociated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury CorpnAssociated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury CorporationAssociated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury CorpAssociated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury CorporationAustralian administrative lawBraganzaCouncil of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil ServiceDr. Bonham's CaseEquality and Human Rights CommissionFettering of discretion in Singapore administrative lawFinancial Ombudsman ServiceFundamental justiceHuang v Home SecretaryIllegality in Singapore administrative lawJudicial review in English lawJudicial review in ScotlandKenneth Diplock, Baron DiplockLegitimate expectationLegitimate expectation in Bangladeshi lawLegitimate expectation in Singapore lawLists of landmark court decisionsNestle v National Westminster Bank plcNewbury principlesNovember 1947Order in CouncilPatently unreasonablePrecedent fact errors in Singapore lawR. v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte CoughlanR v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Bancoult (No 2)Royal prerogative in the United KingdomRulemakingSmith and Grady v United KingdomTest (law)Ultra viresUnited Kingdom administrative law
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 is an English law case that sets out the standard of unreasonableness of public-body decisions that would make them liable to be quashed on judicial review, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness. The court gave three conditions on which it would intervene to correct a bad administrative decision, including on grounds of its unreasonableness in the special sense later articulated in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service by Lord Diplock:
has abstract
Associated Provincial Picture ...... ided could have arrived at it.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,013,971,281
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
caption
Former Wednesbury Cinema
@en
citations
[1948] 1 KB 223,
@en
date decided
1947-11-10
judges
Lord Greene, Somervell LJ, Singleton J
@en
keywords
name
Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Associated Provincial Picture ...... Civil Service by Lord Diplock:
@en
label
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp
@en