Breithaupt v. Abram
Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This case was only the second time the Court considered whether police could forcibly enter inside a suspect's body to extract evidence. Writing for a 6–3 majority, Justice Tom C. Clark argued that blood tests were necessary as a matter of public policy to ensure traffic safety on roads and highways, and that "modern community living requires modern scientific methods of crime detection." Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William O. Douglas both wrote dissenting opinions in which they argued
Wikipage disambiguates
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Breithaupt v. Abram
Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This case was only the second time the Court considered whether police could forcibly enter inside a suspect's body to extract evidence. Writing for a 6–3 majority, Justice Tom C. Clark argued that blood tests were necessary as a matter of public policy to ensure traffic safety on roads and highways, and that "modern community living requires modern scientific methods of crime detection." Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William O. Douglas both wrote dissenting opinions in which they argued
has abstract
Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. ...... lated substantive due process.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
47,111,841
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,895,447
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
align
right
@en
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Breithaupt v. Abram,
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Douglas
@en
Warren
@en
findlaw
fullname
Paul H. Breithaupt, Petitioner v. Morris Abram, Warden
@en
Holding
Involuntary blood samples, tak ...... olate substantive due process.
@en
JoinDissent
Black
@en
Black, Douglas
@en
JoinMajority
Reed, Frankfurter, Burton, Harlan, Brennan
@en
justia
Litigants
Breithaupt v. Abram
@en
majority
Clark
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Mexico, Breithaupt v. Abram, 58 N.M. 385 .
@en
quote
"The increasing slaughter on o ...... heard of on the battlefield."
@en
source
—Justice Tom C. Clark, writing for the majority of the Court
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. ...... opinions in which they argued
@en
label
Breithaupt v. Abram
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Paul H. Breithaupt, Petitioner v. Morris Abram, Warden
@en