Citizens United v. FEC
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the relationship between campaign finance and free speech. It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations and committees established for the purpose of fundraising (PACs).
Wikipage disambiguates
08-205558 U.S. 310Citizen's UnitedCitizens UnitedCitizens United V. Federal Election CommissionCitizens United caseCitizens United decisionCitizens United rulingCitizens United v. FEC, PFAWCitizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'nCitizens United v. Federal Election Com'nCitizens United v. Federal Election Comm'nCitizens United v. Federal Election CommissionCitizens United v. Federal Election Comm’nCitizens United v FECCitizens United v Federal Election CommissionCitizens United vs. FECCitizens unitedCitizens united v fecFEC v Citizens' United
Wikipage redirect
2010 State of the Union Address
2011 State of the Union Address
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
American Tradition Partnership
Americans for Prosperity
08-205111th United States Congress1996 United States campaign finance controversy2010 in the United States2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer2011 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States2012 Republican Party presidential primaries2012 United States elections2013 United States federal government shutdown2014 California elections2016 California Proposition 592016 California elections2019 Cherokee Nation principal chief election2019 North Carolina's 9th congressional district special election501(c)(3) organization558 U.S. 31099 Percent DeclarationAP United States Government and PoliticsAbrams v. United StatesAdam WinklerAl Gross (politician)Alan Simpson (American politician)American Anti-Corruption ActAmerican Civil Liberties UnionAmerican CrossroadsAmerican_Financial_GroupAmerican Promise (organization)American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. BullockAmericans for Prosperity Foundation v. BontaAmy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaignAndrew YangAndrew Yang 2020 presidential campaignAnimal Defenders International v United KingdomAnnie LeonardAnthony Kennedy
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Citizens United v. FEC
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the relationship between campaign finance and free speech. It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations and committees established for the purpose of fundraising (PACs).
has abstract
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... oor bedrijven en verenigingen.
@nl
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... aften verfassungskonform sind.
@de
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... cess of Republican candidates.
@en
El caso Ciudadanos Unidos cont ...... ampañas políticas electorales.
@es
Il caso Cittadini Uniti contro ...... aziende a campagne elettorali.
@it
L'arrêt Citizens United v. Fed ...... dicats et autres associations.
@fr
シチズンズ・ユナイテッド対FEC裁判(シチズンズユナイテッド ...... 1条の表現の自由に反しており、違憲であるという判断を下した。
@ja
联合公民诉联邦选举专员会案(Citizens United ...... 。著名法学家将其称为“近年来关于第一修正案最为重要的案件”。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
22,097,436
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,026,269,390
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,
@en
Concurrence
Roberts
@en
Scalia
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Stevens
@en
Thomas
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
Citizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission
@en
googlescholar
Holding
2592000.0
JoinConcurrence
Alito
@en
Alito; Thomas
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
@en
JoinMajority
Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas ; Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
@en
justia
Litigants
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
@en
majority
Kennedy
@en
OpinionAnnouncement
OralArgument
OralReargument
Overturned previous case
@en
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
@en
McConnell v. FEC
@en
ParallelCitations
Prior
ReargueDate
ReargueYear
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... ke vrijheid van meningsuiting.
@nl
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... aften verfassungskonform sind.
@de
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... purpose of fundraising (PACs).
@en
El caso Ciudadanos Unidos cont ...... ampañas políticas electorales.
@es
Il caso Cittadini Uniti contro ...... aziende a campagne elettorali.
@it
L'arrêt Citizens United v. Fed ...... ctorale par les organisations.
@fr
シチズンズ・ユナイテッド対FEC裁判(シチズンズユナイテッド ...... 1条の表現の自由に反しており、違憲であるという判断を下した。
@ja
联合公民诉联邦选举专员会案(Citizens United ...... 广告是合法的,但仍旧限制企业或组织对于候选人的直接金钱资助。
@zh
label
Caso Ciudadanos Unidos contra la Comisión de Elecciones Federales
@es
Citizens United v. FEC
@en
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
@de
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
@fr
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
@nl
Cittadini Uniti contro la Commissione delle elezioni federali
@it
シチズンズ・ユナイテッド対FEC裁判
@ja
联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案
@zh
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Citizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission
@en