Clubb v Edwards
Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery is a decision of the High Court of Australia. It was a combined hearing of two appeals, raised from the Magistrates Court of Victoria and Tasmania respectively. The appellants, Kathleen Clubb and John Preston; had sought to challenge two laws restricting their conduct near abortion providers, on the ground that the relevant laws were unconstitutional for breach of Australia's freedom of political communication doctrine. Both appeals were unanimously dismissed by the court.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Clubb v Edwards
Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery is a decision of the High Court of Australia. It was a combined hearing of two appeals, raised from the Magistrates Court of Victoria and Tasmania respectively. The appellants, Kathleen Clubb and John Preston; had sought to challenge two laws restricting their conduct near abortion providers, on the ground that the relevant laws were unconstitutional for breach of Australia's freedom of political communication doctrine. Both appeals were unanimously dismissed by the court.
has abstract
Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Ave ...... mously dismissed by the court.
@en
Wikipage page ID
64,674,811
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,025,188,689
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
date decided
2019-04-10
full name
Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery
@en
judges
name
Clubb v Edwards
@en
opinions
@en
Neither Act found to be in bre ...... dom of political communication
@en
appeal dismissed
@en
concurring
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Ave ...... mously dismissed by the court.
@en
label
Clubb v Edwards
@en