D'Emden v Pedder
D'Emden v Pedder was a significant Australian court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 26 April 1904. It directly concerned the question of whether salary receipts of federal government employees were subject to state stamp duty, but it touched on the broader issue within Australian constitutional law of the degree to which the two levels of Australian government were subject to each other's laws. The case is also significant as the first case decided by the High Court involving the interpretation of the Constitution of Australia.
Wikipage disambiguates
Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co LtdBaxter v Commissioners of Taxation (NSW)Deakin v WebbEdmund_BartonEmden (disambiguation)Federated Amalgamated Government Railway & Tramway Service Association v NSW Rail Traffic Employees AssociationHerbert NichollsHigh_Court_of_AustraliaIntergovernmental immunity (Australia)James DrakeList of High Court of Australia casesMcCulloch v. MarylandO'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat LtdPirrie v McFarlaneSection 109 of the Constitution of Australia
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
D'Emden v Pedder
D'Emden v Pedder was a significant Australian court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 26 April 1904. It directly concerned the question of whether salary receipts of federal government employees were subject to state stamp duty, but it touched on the broader issue within Australian constitutional law of the degree to which the two levels of Australian government were subject to each other's laws. The case is also significant as the first case decided by the High Court involving the interpretation of the Constitution of Australia.
has abstract
D'Emden v Pedder was a signifi ...... the Constitution of Australia.
@en
Wikipage page ID
11,975,196
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,005,020,284
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
date decided
1904-04-26
full name
D'Emden v Pedder
@en
name
D'Emden v Pedder
@en
opinions
attempts by the states to exer ...... d by the Constitution, invalid
@en
prior actions
Pedder v D'Emden [1903] TASLawRp 8;
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
D'Emden v Pedder was a signifi ...... the Constitution of Australia.
@en
label
D'Emden v Pedder
@en