Environmental full-cost accounting
Environmental full-cost accounting (EFCA) is a method of cost accounting that traces direct costs and allocates indirect costs by collecting and presenting information about the possible environmental, social and economical costs and benefits or advantages – in short, about the "triple bottom line" – for each proposed alternative. It is also known as true-cost accounting (TCA), but, as definitions for "true" and "full" are inherently subjective, experts consider both terms problematical. These have the advantage of avoiding the more contentious questions of social cost.
American Chemistry CouncilConcentrated animal feeding operationCost of electricity by sourceDaylighting (streams)Debates within libertarianismDisability-adjusted life yearEco-capitalismEco-costsEcological yieldEcotaxEddington Transport StudyEnvironmental, social and corporate governanceEnvironmental accountingEnvironmental full cost accountingEnvironmental governanceEnvironmental impact assessmentEnvironmental profit and loss accountEnvironmental protection expenditure accountsEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmentally honest market systemEostaFCAFourth Bottom LineFree tradeFull-cost accountingFull Cost AccountingFull costFull cost accountingFull cost pricingGender Development IndexGender Parity IndexGenuine progress indicatorGlossary of environmental scienceGreen economyGreen politicsHappy Planet IndexHuman Poverty IndexIndex of Sustainable Economic WelfareIndex of environmental articlesIndustrial ecology
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Environmental full-cost accounting
Environmental full-cost accounting (EFCA) is a method of cost accounting that traces direct costs and allocates indirect costs by collecting and presenting information about the possible environmental, social and economical costs and benefits or advantages – in short, about the "triple bottom line" – for each proposed alternative. It is also known as true-cost accounting (TCA), but, as definitions for "true" and "full" are inherently subjective, experts consider both terms problematical. These have the advantage of avoiding the more contentious questions of social cost.
has abstract
Environmental full-cost accoun ...... ious questions of social cost.
@en
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
986,673,154
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
isPartOf
hypernym
type
comment
Environmental full-cost accoun ...... ious questions of social cost.
@en
label
Environmental full-cost accounting
@en