Ex parte Bowman
Ex Parte Bowman 61 U.S.P.Q.2d 1669 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 2001) was a decision by the U.S. Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences which asserted that in order to be patent-eligible, a process had to involve or promote the technological arts. This decision was overruled by the Board's subsequent Ex Parte Lundgren decision, but the Board's and then the Federal Circuit's In re Bilski opinion then superseded Lundgren. In re Bilski, however, rejects use of "not in the technological arts" as a basis for a rejection, although it seems to accept the concept when differently named. Bilski is now pending on writ of certiorari.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Ex parte Bowman
Ex Parte Bowman 61 U.S.P.Q.2d 1669 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 2001) was a decision by the U.S. Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences which asserted that in order to be patent-eligible, a process had to involve or promote the technological arts. This decision was overruled by the Board's subsequent Ex Parte Lundgren decision, but the Board's and then the Federal Circuit's In re Bilski opinion then superseded Lundgren. In re Bilski, however, rejects use of "not in the technological arts" as a basis for a rejection, although it seems to accept the concept when differently named. Bilski is now pending on writ of certiorari.
has abstract
Ex Parte Bowman 61 U.S.P.Q.2d ...... pending on writ of certiorari.
@en
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
847,361,876
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
auto
yes
@en
date
December 2009
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
Ex Parte Bowman 61 U.S.P.Q.2d ...... pending on writ of certiorari.
@en
label
Ex parte Bowman
@en