Hanousek v. United States
Hanousek v. United States, 176 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 1999), was a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which held that ordinary negligence was the legal standard for criminal negligence under the Clean Water Act. The Supreme Court of the United States denied review of the Ninth Circuit's decision, provoking a dissent from two justices.
Wikipage disambiguates
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Hanousek v. United States
Hanousek v. United States, 176 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 1999), was a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which held that ordinary negligence was the legal standard for criminal negligence under the Clean Water Act. The Supreme Court of the United States denied review of the Ninth Circuit's decision, provoking a dissent from two justices.
has abstract
Hanousek v. United States, 176 ...... g a dissent from two justices.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
27,561,488
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,016,567,750
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
citations
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
Edward Hanousek, Jr. v. United States of America
@en
JoinMajority
a unanimous court
@en
judges
David R. Thompson, A. Wallace Tashima, Tom Stagg
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Hanousek v. United States
@en
majority
Thompson
@en
other source
Google Scholar
@en
OpenJurist
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Hanousek v. United States, 176 ...... g a dissent from two justices.
@en
label
Hanousek v. United States
@en