Hopkinson v Police
Hopkinson v Police was a successful appeal by a protester convicted for the offence of burning the New Zealand flag with the intention of dishonouring it. The case is notable because of the High Court's interpretation of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981 in a manner consistent with the Bill of Rights Act 1990. Justice Ellen France held that "the prohibition of flag burning under the Act was a breach of the right to freedom of expression, and such a limit was not justified under s 5 of the Bill of Rights."
Wikipage disambiguates
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Hopkinson v Police
Hopkinson v Police was a successful appeal by a protester convicted for the offence of burning the New Zealand flag with the intention of dishonouring it. The case is notable because of the High Court's interpretation of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981 in a manner consistent with the Bill of Rights Act 1990. Justice Ellen France held that "the prohibition of flag burning under the Act was a breach of the right to freedom of expression, and such a limit was not justified under s 5 of the Bill of Rights."
has abstract
Hopkinson v Police was a succe ...... er s 5 of the Bill of Rights."
@en
Wikipage page ID
46,699,324
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
994,386,919
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
[2004] 3 NZLR 704
@en
date decided
2004-07-23
judges
name
Hopkinson v Police
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
Hopkinson v Police was a succe ...... er s 5 of the Bill of Rights."
@en
label
Hopkinson v Police
@en