Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
Kirin-Amgen, Inc. v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd. is a decision by the House of Lords of England and Wales. The judgment was issued on 21 October 2004 and relates to the scope to be accorded to patent claims, including the doctrine of equivalents. The case and subsequent judgment affirmed principles from a prior case, Catnic Components Ltd. v. Hill & Smith Ltd.
Wikipage disambiguates
AmgenAmgen v HoechstCatnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith LtdDoctrine of equivalentsImprover Corp v Remington Consumer Product LtdKirin-Amgen Inc. and others v. Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd. and othersKirin-Amgen Inc. v Hoechst Marion Roussel LtdKirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd (2004)Kirin-Amgen v HoechstKirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion RousselKirinAmgen v. TKTLennie Hoffmann, Baron HoffmannList of House of Lords casesList of UK judgments relating to excluded subject matterList of landmark United Kingdom House of Lords casesList of patent case lawRoussel
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
Kirin-Amgen, Inc. v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd. is a decision by the House of Lords of England and Wales. The judgment was issued on 21 October 2004 and relates to the scope to be accorded to patent claims, including the doctrine of equivalents. The case and subsequent judgment affirmed principles from a prior case, Catnic Components Ltd. v. Hill & Smith Ltd.
has abstract
Kirin-Amgen, Inc. v Hoechst Ma ...... also Doctrine of equivalents.)
@en
Wikipage page ID
14,351,738
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,011,053,502
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
[2004] UKHL 46
@en
full name
Kirin-Amgen Inc and others v. ...... ion Roussel Limited and others
@en
judges
name
Kirin-Amgen, Inc. v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Kirin-Amgen, Inc. v Hoechst Ma ...... ents Ltd. v. Hill & Smith Ltd.
@en
label
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
@en