Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, also known as the McDonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, was a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the United States over tort reform. Although a New Mexico civil jury awarded $2.86 million to plaintiff Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman who suffered third-degree burns in her pelvic region when she accidentally spilled hot coffee in her lap after purchasing it from a McDonald's restaurant, Liebeck was ultimately only awarded $640,000. Liebeck was hospitalized for eight days while she underwent skin grafting, followed by two years of medical treatment.
Wikipage disambiguates
Hot coffee caseHot coffee lawsuitLiebeck v. McDonald'sLiebeck v. McDonald's Corp.Liebeck v. McDonalds RestaurantsMcDonald's Hot CoffeeMcDonald's Hot Coffee lawsuitMcDonald's coffee caseMcDonald's coffee lawsuitMcdonald's coffee lawsuitMcdonald's hot coffee suit caseMcdonalds coffee incidentMcdonalds coffee lawsuitStella LiebeckStella Liebeck v. McDonald's CorporationStella Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald's International, Inc.
Wikipage redirect
American Ride (song)Apache ChiefCompensation cultureCosmo KramerCrisis communicationCup holderDuty to warnHot CoffeeHot Coffee (film)Hot coffee caseHot coffee lawsuitJackie ChilesLiebeckLiebeck v. McDonald'sLiebeck v. McDonald's Corp.Liebeck v. McDonald's RestaurantsLiebeck v. McDonalds RestaurantsList of Adam Ruins Everything episodesList of Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law episodesList of tort casesMcDonald'sMcDonald's Hot CoffeeMcDonald's Hot Coffee lawsuitMcDonald's coffee caseMcDonald's coffee lawsuitMcLibel caseMcdonald's coffee lawsuitMcdonald's hot coffee suit caseMcdonalds coffee incidentMcdonalds coffee lawsuitMr. Monk in Outer SpaceProduct liabilityPunitive damagesRandy CassinghamRetro ReportSeinfeldStella (given name)Stella LiebeckStella Liebeck v. McDonald's Corporation
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, also known as the McDonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, was a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the United States over tort reform. Although a New Mexico civil jury awarded $2.86 million to plaintiff Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman who suffered third-degree burns in her pelvic region when she accidentally spilled hot coffee in her lap after purchasing it from a McDonald's restaurant, Liebeck was ultimately only awarded $640,000. Liebeck was hospitalized for eight days while she underwent skin grafting, followed by two years of medical treatment.
has abstract
Le procès Liebeck contre McDon ...... ème judiciaire des États-Unis.
@fr
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaura ...... red in debates on tort reform.
@en
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaura ...... sat perdebatan reformasi tort.
@in
ليبيك ضد مطاعم ماكدونالدز، الم ...... ركزت على مناقشات إصلاح الضرر.
@ar
マクドナルド・コーヒー事件(マクドナルド・コーヒーじけん)は、アメリカ合衆国ニューメキシコ州のマクドナルドで起きた事故と、その事故をめぐる裁判のことである。
@ja
里貝克訴麥當勞餐廳案(英語:Liebeck v. McDon ...... 當勞遲遲不庭外和解並非他們造錯,而是因為他們知道此案的荒謬。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Link from a Wikipage to a Wikipage in a different language about the same or a related subject.
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,026,196,743
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
date decided
1994-08-18
full name
Stella Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald's International, Inc.
@en
judges
Robert H. Scott
@en
name
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Le procès Liebeck contre McDon ...... ème judiciaire des États-Unis.
@fr
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaura ...... wo years of medical treatment.
@en
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaura ...... awatan medis selama dua tahun.
@in
ليبيك ضد مطاعم ماكدونالدز، الم ...... ، تلتها سنتان من العلاج الطبي.
@ar
マクドナルド・コーヒー事件(マクドナルド・コーヒーじけん)は、アメリカ合衆国ニューメキシコ州のマクドナルドで起きた事故と、その事故をめぐる裁判のことである。
@ja
里貝克訴麥當勞餐廳案(英語:Liebeck v. McDon ...... 解。事件在美國引起了很大反響,有輿論認為這是一宗浪費公帑的。
@zh
label
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
@en
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
@fr
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
@in
ليبيك ضد مطاعم ماكدونالدز
@ar
マクドナルド・コーヒー事件
@ja
里貝克訴麥當勞餐廳案
@zh