Molina-Martinez v. United States
Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's reliance on a requirement that defendants show "additional evidence" to show substantial harm arising from incorrect sentencing guidelines is impermissible.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Molina-Martinez v. United States
Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's reliance on a requirement that defendants show "additional evidence" to show substantial harm arising from incorrect sentencing guidelines is impermissible.
has abstract
Molina-Martinez v. United Stat ...... g guidelines is impermissible.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
50,276,623
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,900,610
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Molina-Martinez v. United States,
@en
Concurrence
Alito
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Saul Molina-Martinez, Petitioner v. United States
@en
Holding
Courts may not have rigid requ ...... correct sentencing guidelines.
@en
JoinConcurrence
Thomas
@en
JoinMajority
Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Peugh v. United States
@en
Litigants
Molina-Martinez v. United States
@en
majority
Kennedy
@en
OpinionAnnouncement
other source
Supreme Court
@en
other url
oyez
ParallelCitations
USPage
___
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Molina-Martinez v. United Stat ...... g guidelines is impermissible.
@en
label
Molina-Martinez v. United States
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Saul Molina-Martinez, Petitioner v. United States
@en