Murdock v. Pennsylvania
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door salespersons ("solicitors") to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on religious exercise.
319 U.S. 105Busey v. District of ColumbiaFollett v. Town of McCormickHayden C. CovingtonJones v. City of Opelika (1942)List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Stone CourtList of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First AmendmentList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesMay 1943Murdock v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaMurdock v PennsylvaniaPoulos v. New HampshirePreferred positionWest Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door salespersons ("solicitors") to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on religious exercise.
has abstract
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U ...... nal tax on religious exercise.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
13,930,309
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
934,071,286
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Murdock v. Pennsylvania,
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Frankfurter
@en
Reed
@en
findlaw
fullname
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
@en
googlescholar
Holding
A Pennsylvania ordinance impos ...... ates the Free Exercise clause.
@en
JoinDissent
Jackson
@en
Roberts, Frankfurter, Jackson
@en
JoinMajority
Stone, Black, Murphy, Rutledge
@en
justia
Litigants
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
@en
majority
Douglas
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U ...... nal tax on religious exercise.
@en
label
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
@en