Paradox of analysis
The paradox of analysis (or Langford–Moore paradox) is a paradox that concerns how an analysis can be both correct and informative. The problem was formulated by philosopher G. E. Moore in his book Principia Ethica, and first named by C. H. Langford in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, Northwestern University, 1942, pp. 319–342).
Wikipage redirect
differentFrom
primaryTopic
Paradox of analysis
The paradox of analysis (or Langford–Moore paradox) is a paradox that concerns how an analysis can be both correct and informative. The problem was formulated by philosopher G. E. Moore in his book Principia Ethica, and first named by C. H. Langford in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, Northwestern University, 1942, pp. 319–342).
has abstract
Analysens paradox eller analys ...... tiska filosofin.[källa behövs]
@sv
O paradoxo da análise é um par ...... análise na filosofia de Moore.
@pt
The paradox of analysis (or La ...... niversity, 1942, pp. 319–342).
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
22,035,894
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
999,559,793
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
type
comment
Analysens paradox eller analys ...... urskiljas i sådana sammanhang.
@sv
O paradoxo da análise é um par ...... análise na filosofia de Moore.
@pt
The paradox of analysis (or La ...... niversity, 1942, pp. 319–342).
@en
label
Analysens paradox
@sv
Paradox of analysis
@en
Paradoxo da análise
@pt